본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Cost-effectiveness of an artificial intelligence predictive model for guiding androgen deprivation therapy in intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

2/5 보강
JNCI cancer spectrum 📖 저널 OA 90.4% 2022: 1/1 OA 2024: 2/2 OA 2025: 16/16 OA 2026: 28/33 OA 2022~2026 2026 OA Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatm
Retraction 확인
출처
PubMed DOI OpenAlex 마지막 보강 2026-04-30

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
환자: intermediate-risk prostate cancer receiving radiotherapy using NRG/RTOG 9408 data on which ArteraAI was validated
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
The ADT-for-all strategy was dominated by the NCCN strategy. Compared with the NCCN strategy, the ArteraAI strategy lowered costs by $12,296 and improved effectiveness by 0.01 QALYs, and thus was dominant.
OpenAlex 토픽 · Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques

Courtney PT, Shih YT, Chang AJ, Lee A, Steinberg ML, Valle LF, Venkat PS, Kishan AU, Raldow AC

📖 무료 전문 🔓 OA PDF oa
📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

The ArteraAI Prostate Test (ArteraAI Inc.) is the first predictive biomarker for benefit of adding short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to radiotherapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA P Travis Courtney, Ya-Chen Tina Shih, et al. (2026). Cost-effectiveness of an artificial intelligence predictive model for guiding androgen deprivation therapy in intermediate-risk prostate cancer.. JNCI cancer spectrum. https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkag035
MLA P Travis Courtney, et al.. "Cost-effectiveness of an artificial intelligence predictive model for guiding androgen deprivation therapy in intermediate-risk prostate cancer.." JNCI cancer spectrum, 2026.
PMID 41967115 ↗

Abstract

The ArteraAI Prostate Test (ArteraAI Inc.) is the first predictive biomarker for benefit of adding short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to radiotherapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of ArteraAI to guide short-term ADT with a Markov model simulating 15-year outcomes for 71-year-old patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer receiving radiotherapy using NRG/RTOG 9408 data on which ArteraAI was validated. Three strategies were compared: 1) all patients receive ADT (ADT-for-all), 2) only patients with unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer receive ADT (National Comprehensive Cancer Network [NCCN]), and 3) only ArteraAI-positive patients receive ADT (ArteraAI). Costs and utilities obtained from Medicare claims and published literature were used to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). A willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY was chosen. The ADT-for-all strategy was dominated by the NCCN strategy. Compared with the NCCN strategy, the ArteraAI strategy lowered costs by $12,296 and improved effectiveness by 0.01 QALYs, and thus was dominant.

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)

🔓 OA PDF 열기