Cost-effectiveness of an artificial intelligence predictive model for guiding androgen deprivation therapy in intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
2/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
환자: intermediate-risk prostate cancer receiving radiotherapy using NRG/RTOG 9408 data on which ArteraAI was validated
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
The ADT-for-all strategy was dominated by the NCCN strategy. Compared with the NCCN strategy, the ArteraAI strategy lowered costs by $12,296 and improved effectiveness by 0.01 QALYs, and thus was dominant.
OpenAlex 토픽 ·
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
The ArteraAI Prostate Test (ArteraAI Inc.) is the first predictive biomarker for benefit of adding short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to radiotherapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
APA
P Travis Courtney, Ya-Chen Tina Shih, et al. (2026). Cost-effectiveness of an artificial intelligence predictive model for guiding androgen deprivation therapy in intermediate-risk prostate cancer.. JNCI cancer spectrum. https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkag035
MLA
P Travis Courtney, et al.. "Cost-effectiveness of an artificial intelligence predictive model for guiding androgen deprivation therapy in intermediate-risk prostate cancer.." JNCI cancer spectrum, 2026.
PMID
41967115 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
The ArteraAI Prostate Test (ArteraAI Inc.) is the first predictive biomarker for benefit of adding short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to radiotherapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of ArteraAI to guide short-term ADT with a Markov model simulating 15-year outcomes for 71-year-old patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer receiving radiotherapy using NRG/RTOG 9408 data on which ArteraAI was validated. Three strategies were compared: 1) all patients receive ADT (ADT-for-all), 2) only patients with unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer receive ADT (National Comprehensive Cancer Network [NCCN]), and 3) only ArteraAI-positive patients receive ADT (ArteraAI). Costs and utilities obtained from Medicare claims and published literature were used to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). A willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY was chosen. The ADT-for-all strategy was dominated by the NCCN strategy. Compared with the NCCN strategy, the ArteraAI strategy lowered costs by $12,296 and improved effectiveness by 0.01 QALYs, and thus was dominant.