본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Final results of a randomized controlled trial: comparison of the efficacy and safety between totally laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy for advanced Siewert III esophagogastric junction cancer and upper and middle third gastric cancer.

무작위 임상시험 1/5 보강
International journal of surgery (London, England) 📖 저널 OA 57.3% 2021: 0/3 OA 2022: 0/6 OA 2023: 9/9 OA 2024: 53/53 OA 2025: 129/222 OA 2026: 128/242 OA 2021~2026 2025 Vol.111(1) p. 686-696
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
292 patients with the mentioned cancers, randomly assigned to TLTG overlap ( n =146) or LATG ( n =146) groups.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
This technique has the potential to be the preferred esophagojejunostomy approach in TLTG. [TRIAL REGISTRATION] This trial has been registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR1900025667 (registration date: 4 September 2019).

Wang J, Liu S, Chen H, Luo J, Xu G, Feng X, Yang X, Yang J, Gang J

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of TLTG with the overlap technique to LATG in patients with advanced Siewert III Esophagogastric Junction Cancer and upper and middle t

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 146
  • p-value P=0.047
  • p-value P =0.058
  • 연구 설계 RCT

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Wang J, Liu S, et al. (2025). Final results of a randomized controlled trial: comparison of the efficacy and safety between totally laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy for advanced Siewert III esophagogastric junction cancer and upper and middle third gastric cancer.. International journal of surgery (London, England), 111(1), 686-696. https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002062
MLA Wang J, et al.. "Final results of a randomized controlled trial: comparison of the efficacy and safety between totally laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy for advanced Siewert III esophagogastric junction cancer and upper and middle third gastric cancer.." International journal of surgery (London, England), vol. 111, no. 1, 2025, pp. 686-696.
PMID 39185962 ↗

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of TLTG with the overlap technique to LATG in patients with advanced Siewert III Esophagogastric Junction Cancer and upper and middle third gastric cancer.

[METHODS] This single-center RCT enrolled 292 patients with the mentioned cancers, randomly assigned to TLTG overlap ( n =146) or LATG ( n =146) groups. Data on demographics, pathology, intraoperative variables, postoperative complications, recovery parameters, and 3-year survival were collected. Main outcome: postoperative complications within 30 days. Secondary outcomes: 3-year disease-free and overall survival.

[RESULTS] TLTG versus LATG: TLTG had shorter incision, faster flatus/defecation, reduced analgesia, less opioid use, and shorter hospital stay. Similar operation time, anastomosis time, blood loss, and lymph node harvest. TLTG had a lower overall post-op complication rate (P=0.047) and no significant difference in serious complications ( P =0.310). Variances in anastomotic stenosis occurrence at 3 months. No rehospitalization or mortality at 30 days. No significant differences in 3-month disease-free survival ( P =0.058) or overall survival ( P =0.236).

[CONCLUSION] The overlap method for anastomosis in TLTG is safe and feasible for advanced middle-upper-third gastric cancer, with positive short-term outcomes. This technique has the potential to be the preferred esophagojejunostomy approach in TLTG.

[TRIAL REGISTRATION] This trial has been registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR1900025667 (registration date: 4 September 2019).

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기