본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and F-FDG PET/CT: a head-to-head comparison for peritoneal carcinomatosis diagnostic accuracy.

1/5 보강
Abdominal radiology (New York) 📖 저널 OA 19.7% 2021: 0/1 OA 2022: 0/1 OA 2023: 1/2 OA 2024: 3/15 OA 2025: 16/79 OA 2026: 25/129 OA 2021~2026 2025 Vol.50(7) p. 3137-3147
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
113 patients with suspected peritoneal malignancy, each of whom underwent Ga-FAPI and F-FDG PET/CT scans.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
Ga-FAPI and F-FDG PET/CT scans
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS] Ga-FAPI has demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy compared to F-FDG PET/CT in detecting PC with various types of cancer, particularly gastric cancer. Additionally, Ga-FAPI has shown significantly higher uptake and PCI score in PC compared to F-FDG, indicating its potential importance in clinical.

Chen X, Pang X, Zhao Y, Liu Y, Jing F, Yuan H, Chen X, Li T, Wang Y, Liu Y, Han J, Zhang J, Wang J, Zhang Z, Zhao X

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[PURPOSE] The study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 (Ga-FAPI) and F-FDG PET/CT for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) in patients with various types of cancer.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value P = 0.001
  • p-value P < 0.001

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Chen X, Pang X, et al. (2025). Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and F-FDG PET/CT: a head-to-head comparison for peritoneal carcinomatosis diagnostic accuracy.. Abdominal radiology (New York), 50(7), 3137-3147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04653-6
MLA Chen X, et al.. "Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and F-FDG PET/CT: a head-to-head comparison for peritoneal carcinomatosis diagnostic accuracy.." Abdominal radiology (New York), vol. 50, no. 7, 2025, pp. 3137-3147.
PMID 39751881 ↗

Abstract

[PURPOSE] The study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 (Ga-FAPI) and F-FDG PET/CT for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) in patients with various types of cancer.

[METHODS] The study enrolled 113 patients with suspected peritoneal malignancy, each of whom underwent Ga-FAPI and F-FDG PET/CT scans. Lesions in all patients were confirmed through pathology or radiological follow-up. The evaluation and comparison of diagnostic performance, visual scores, maximum standardized uptake value (SUV), mean tumor-to-background ratio (TBR), and the peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score were conducted.

[RESULTS] Compared to F-FDG, Ga-FAPI PET/CT presented higher sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy for detecting PC on a patient-level (100% vs. 93.2%, 100% vs. 22.22% and 93.81% vs. 86.73%, respectively). Semi-quantitative evaluation revealed that Ga-FAPI PET/CT had significantly higher SUV and TBR for PC [(6.06 ± 3.04 vs. 4.82 ± 2.75, P = 0.001) and (8.50 ± 5.01 vs. 2.92 ± 1.67, P < 0.001)]. The PCI score for PC was higher than the PCI score (11.28 ± 7.10 vs. 5.69 ± 5.15, P < 0.001).

[CONCLUSIONS] Ga-FAPI has demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy compared to F-FDG PET/CT in detecting PC with various types of cancer, particularly gastric cancer. Additionally, Ga-FAPI has shown significantly higher uptake and PCI score in PC compared to F-FDG, indicating its potential importance in clinical.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반