Utilizing Combined Circulating Tumor DNA and Tumor Markers to Evaluate Neoadjuvant Therapy Response and Predict Recurrence in Patients with Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer.
[BACKGROUND] Accurately assessing treatment response and predicting recurrence in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy is challenging.
- p-value P = 0.005
- p-value P < 0.001
APA
Zhu H, Jia Y, et al. (2025). Utilizing Combined Circulating Tumor DNA and Tumor Markers to Evaluate Neoadjuvant Therapy Response and Predict Recurrence in Patients with Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer.. Annals of surgical oncology, 32(9), 6817-6828. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17397-4
MLA
Zhu H, et al.. "Utilizing Combined Circulating Tumor DNA and Tumor Markers to Evaluate Neoadjuvant Therapy Response and Predict Recurrence in Patients with Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer.." Annals of surgical oncology, vol. 32, no. 9, 2025, pp. 6817-6828.
PMID
40459666
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Accurately assessing treatment response and predicting recurrence in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy is challenging. This study explores the use of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and its combination with tumor markers (TM) for this purpose.
[PATIENTS AND METHODS] We retrospectively analyzed 44 patients, collecting plasma samples at pretreatment (T0), after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (T1), and 3-10 days after surgery (T2), along with tissue samples. Tumor markers (TMs), including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9, CA72-4, CA125, and CA242, were also measured.
[RESULTS] ctDNA was detected in 64.1% of patients at T0, gradually decreasing to 41.0% at T1 and further to 33.3% at T2. Among those with ctDNA-positive at T0, 64.3% of the responders achieved ctDNA clearance, whereas only 8.3% of the non-responders exhibited this outcome (P = 0.005). When being positive at either T0 or T1 was defined as positive, 66.7% of patients were ctDNA positive, and 51.3% were TM positive. Combining both markers increased the overall positive rate to 94.9%. In assessing treatment effectiveness, the agreement with pathological response is 83.8%, higher than using ctDNA alone (76.9%) or TM (80.0%). After surgery, patients with ctDNA positive or TM positive (ctDNA+/TM+) showed worse overall survival (OS, HR 14.667; P < 0.001) compared with those negative for both (ctDNA-/TM-). ctDNA+/TM+ was an independent prognostic factor in a multivariate Cox analysis (adjusted HR 9.771, P = 0.045).
[CONCLUSIONS] ctDNA demonstrates promise as a predictive marker for NACT response and recurrence risk. TMs can be cross complemented with ctDNA to better evaluate patient outcomes and enable more patients to be accurately evaluated.
[PATIENTS AND METHODS] We retrospectively analyzed 44 patients, collecting plasma samples at pretreatment (T0), after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (T1), and 3-10 days after surgery (T2), along with tissue samples. Tumor markers (TMs), including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9, CA72-4, CA125, and CA242, were also measured.
[RESULTS] ctDNA was detected in 64.1% of patients at T0, gradually decreasing to 41.0% at T1 and further to 33.3% at T2. Among those with ctDNA-positive at T0, 64.3% of the responders achieved ctDNA clearance, whereas only 8.3% of the non-responders exhibited this outcome (P = 0.005). When being positive at either T0 or T1 was defined as positive, 66.7% of patients were ctDNA positive, and 51.3% were TM positive. Combining both markers increased the overall positive rate to 94.9%. In assessing treatment effectiveness, the agreement with pathological response is 83.8%, higher than using ctDNA alone (76.9%) or TM (80.0%). After surgery, patients with ctDNA positive or TM positive (ctDNA+/TM+) showed worse overall survival (OS, HR 14.667; P < 0.001) compared with those negative for both (ctDNA-/TM-). ctDNA+/TM+ was an independent prognostic factor in a multivariate Cox analysis (adjusted HR 9.771, P = 0.045).
[CONCLUSIONS] ctDNA demonstrates promise as a predictive marker for NACT response and recurrence risk. TMs can be cross complemented with ctDNA to better evaluate patient outcomes and enable more patients to be accurately evaluated.
MeSH Terms
Humans; Female; Male; Stomach Neoplasms; Biomarkers, Tumor; Circulating Tumor DNA; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Middle Aged; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Retrospective Studies; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Prognosis; Survival Rate; Follow-Up Studies; Adult; Carcinoembryonic Antigen
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)
- Letter to the Editor: Updates in Abbreviated MRI-Based HCC Surveillance.
- Sexual Health Needs and Physician-Patient Interaction Experiences Among Postoperative Radical Prostatectomy Patients in China: A Qualitative Study.
- MRI-Based Habitat Analysis for Predicting Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Study.
- Radiotherapy for Unresectable Locally Advanced NSCLC: A Practical Multidisciplinary Approach to Challenging Scenarios From the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Advanced Radiation Technology Subcommittee.
- CD36-Mediated Fatty Acid Oxidation in CTCs Drives Immune Evasion and Metastasis in NSCLC.