Diagnostic Value of Serum Pepsinogen and Infection in Gastric Cancer Screening in Western Zhejiang.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
환자: GC and those with benign gastric diseases in western Zhejiang
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
gastroscopy at the First People's Hospital of Jiande between July 2020 and July 2023
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSION] Serum PG expression and infection rates differed between patients with GC and those with benign gastric diseases in western Zhejiang. Models combining PG with demographic variables demonstrated a good diagnostic value for GC, including EGC, supporting their potential application in noninvasive GC screening.
[OBJECTIVE] The aim of this study is to assess the screening value of serum pepsinogen (PG) expression and () infection for gastric cancer (GC) in western Zhejiang.
APA
Yan DH, Li YF (2026). Diagnostic Value of Serum Pepsinogen and Infection in Gastric Cancer Screening in Western Zhejiang.. Gastroenterology research and practice, 2026, 9113753. https://doi.org/10.1155/grp/9113753
MLA
Yan DH, et al.. "Diagnostic Value of Serum Pepsinogen and Infection in Gastric Cancer Screening in Western Zhejiang.." Gastroenterology research and practice, vol. 2026, 2026, pp. 9113753.
PMID
41777730 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[OBJECTIVE] The aim of this study is to assess the screening value of serum pepsinogen (PG) expression and () infection for gastric cancer (GC) in western Zhejiang.
[METHODS] A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent gastroscopy at the First People's Hospital of Jiande between July 2020 and July 2023. Participants were classified into four groups: chronic nonatrophic gastritis, chronic atrophic gastritis, peptic ulcer, and GC, which included early gastric cancer (EGC) and advanced GC. Serum pepsinogen I (PGI), pepsinogen II (PGII), pepsinogen ratio (PGR), and anti- immunoglobulin G (Hp-IgG) levels were measured. Group differences were assessed, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the diagnostic performance of PG alone and in combination with Hp-IgG, age, and sex for GC and EGC.
[RESULTS] Significant differences were observed among the four groups in PGI, PGII, PGR, infection rate, age, and sex ( < 0.01). In benign gastric diseases, PGI and PGII levels increased with the severity and activity of gastric mucosal inflammation ( < 0.05). PGII levels were associated with tumor size and Lauren classification ( < 0.05), while PGR was associated with GC stage ( = 0.021). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for PG alone in differentiating GC/EGC from benign gastric diseases ranged from 0.598 to 0.813, whereas the model incorporating PG, Hp-IgG, age, and sex achieved an AUC of 0.851.
[CONCLUSION] Serum PG expression and infection rates differed between patients with GC and those with benign gastric diseases in western Zhejiang. Models combining PG with demographic variables demonstrated a good diagnostic value for GC, including EGC, supporting their potential application in noninvasive GC screening.
[METHODS] A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent gastroscopy at the First People's Hospital of Jiande between July 2020 and July 2023. Participants were classified into four groups: chronic nonatrophic gastritis, chronic atrophic gastritis, peptic ulcer, and GC, which included early gastric cancer (EGC) and advanced GC. Serum pepsinogen I (PGI), pepsinogen II (PGII), pepsinogen ratio (PGR), and anti- immunoglobulin G (Hp-IgG) levels were measured. Group differences were assessed, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the diagnostic performance of PG alone and in combination with Hp-IgG, age, and sex for GC and EGC.
[RESULTS] Significant differences were observed among the four groups in PGI, PGII, PGR, infection rate, age, and sex ( < 0.01). In benign gastric diseases, PGI and PGII levels increased with the severity and activity of gastric mucosal inflammation ( < 0.05). PGII levels were associated with tumor size and Lauren classification ( < 0.05), while PGR was associated with GC stage ( = 0.021). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for PG alone in differentiating GC/EGC from benign gastric diseases ranged from 0.598 to 0.813, whereas the model incorporating PG, Hp-IgG, age, and sex achieved an AUC of 0.851.
[CONCLUSION] Serum PG expression and infection rates differed between patients with GC and those with benign gastric diseases in western Zhejiang. Models combining PG with demographic variables demonstrated a good diagnostic value for GC, including EGC, supporting their potential application in noninvasive GC screening.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- Updated evaluation of additional surgery versus non-gastrectomy treatment for early gastric cancer after noncurative endoscopic resection: a meta-analysis.
- Discrepancies between preoperative assessment and final pathological criteria in early gastric cancer.
- Risk Factors for Lateral Margin Positivity Following Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer.
- Identification and validation of a refined CAF-Associated diagnostic signature in breast cancer.
- Effectiveness of the aspiration method in preventing delayed bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.
- Construction of a Mitochondria-Related Gene Diagnostic Model Based on Integrated Multiomics Data and Functional Validation of ANK2 as a Key Regulator in Colorectal Cancer.