Effectiveness of the aspiration method in preventing delayed bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.
[BACKGROUND] Delayed bleeding is a severe complication of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).
- p-value P = 0.018
- p-value P = 0.016
APA
Liu G, Guo X, et al. (2026). Effectiveness of the aspiration method in preventing delayed bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.. Surgical endoscopy, 40(2), 1182-1190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12324-w
MLA
Liu G, et al.. "Effectiveness of the aspiration method in preventing delayed bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.." Surgical endoscopy, vol. 40, no. 2, 2026, pp. 1182-1190.
PMID
41225173
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Delayed bleeding is a severe complication of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We conducted a study to evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of a simple aspiration method for preventing delayed bleeding after gastric ESD.
[METHODS] The clinical, endoscopic and pathological data of patients who underwent ESD for early gastric cancer and other gastric lesions at our center from January 2022 to December 2024 was retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent aspiration method were categorized into the aspiration group, and those without aspiration method were included in the control group. The incidences of massive delayed bleeding and overall delayed bleeding were compared between two groups.
[RESULTS] Three hundred sixty-four patients with 364 lesions were included in this study. 143 were enrolled in the aspiration group and 221 were enrolled in the control group. The baseline characteristics of the two groups are comparable. The incidence of massive delayed bleeding and overall delayed bleeding was significantly lower in the aspiration group compared to control group (0.7 vs. 5.4%, P = 0.018 for massive delayed bleeding; 7.0 vs. 15.4%, P = 0.016 for overall delayed bleeding), especially in lesions located in the middle and lower thirds of the stomach (0.9 vs. 6.8%, P = 0.044 for massive delayed bleeding, 7.3 vs. 16.8%, P = 0.024 for overall bleeding), lesions with longer procedure duration (0 vs. 9.6%, P = 0.020 for massive delayed bleeding, 10.3 vs. 24.6%, P = 0.018 for overall bleeding), and lesions performed by experienced endoscopists (1.0 vs. 7.7%, P = 0.040 for massive delayed bleeding, 9.2 vs. 19.0%, P = 0.036 for overall bleeding).
[CONCLUSIONS] Our study suggested that the aspiration method was a simple, safe, and effective method for preventing delayed bleeding following gastric ESD, particularly in lesions with high-risk factors for delayed bleeding.
[METHODS] The clinical, endoscopic and pathological data of patients who underwent ESD for early gastric cancer and other gastric lesions at our center from January 2022 to December 2024 was retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent aspiration method were categorized into the aspiration group, and those without aspiration method were included in the control group. The incidences of massive delayed bleeding and overall delayed bleeding were compared between two groups.
[RESULTS] Three hundred sixty-four patients with 364 lesions were included in this study. 143 were enrolled in the aspiration group and 221 were enrolled in the control group. The baseline characteristics of the two groups are comparable. The incidence of massive delayed bleeding and overall delayed bleeding was significantly lower in the aspiration group compared to control group (0.7 vs. 5.4%, P = 0.018 for massive delayed bleeding; 7.0 vs. 15.4%, P = 0.016 for overall delayed bleeding), especially in lesions located in the middle and lower thirds of the stomach (0.9 vs. 6.8%, P = 0.044 for massive delayed bleeding, 7.3 vs. 16.8%, P = 0.024 for overall bleeding), lesions with longer procedure duration (0 vs. 9.6%, P = 0.020 for massive delayed bleeding, 10.3 vs. 24.6%, P = 0.018 for overall bleeding), and lesions performed by experienced endoscopists (1.0 vs. 7.7%, P = 0.040 for massive delayed bleeding, 9.2 vs. 19.0%, P = 0.036 for overall bleeding).
[CONCLUSIONS] Our study suggested that the aspiration method was a simple, safe, and effective method for preventing delayed bleeding following gastric ESD, particularly in lesions with high-risk factors for delayed bleeding.
MeSH Terms
Humans; Endoscopic Mucosal Resection; Female; Retrospective Studies; Male; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Stomach Neoplasms; Middle Aged; Aged; Gastroscopy; Feasibility Studies; Suction; Time Factors
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)
- m6A-Modified BASP1 Regulates IL6 Expression to Induce TAM Infiltration to Promote Gastric Cancer Progression.
- Real-world incidence, prevalence, and clinical impact of brain metastases in patients with ALK-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer treated with first-line ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
- Efficacy and safety of short-course blinatumomab in patients with relapsed/refractory or MRD-positive B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
- Angiotensin‑converting enzyme 2 as an immune and prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer.
- PSMA PET-guided intensification of postprostatectomy salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.