본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Development of a Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model for Anastomotic Leakage Following Gastric Cancer Surgery.

1/5 보강
The American surgeon 2026 Vol.92(4) p. 1189-1205
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
1588 patients undergoing radical gastrectomy at two tertiary medical centers.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
External validation demonstrated moderate generalizability with an AUC difference of 0.054 between training and validation sets. Multicenter validation remains essential for clinical translation.

Ma W, Zhao S, Du N, Xie J, Yang Y, Liu J, Yu Y

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

BackgroundThe incidence of anastomotic leakage (AL) following radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer ranges from 2.1% to 14.6%, with mortality rates up to 50%.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • Sensitivity 71.2%
  • Specificity 87.3%

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Ma W, Zhao S, et al. (2026). Development of a Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model for Anastomotic Leakage Following Gastric Cancer Surgery.. The American surgeon, 92(4), 1189-1205. https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251391850
MLA Ma W, et al.. "Development of a Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model for Anastomotic Leakage Following Gastric Cancer Surgery.." The American surgeon, vol. 92, no. 4, 2026, pp. 1189-1205.
PMID 41126480

Abstract

BackgroundThe incidence of anastomotic leakage (AL) following radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer ranges from 2.1% to 14.6%, with mortality rates up to 50%. Existing predictive methods lack both timeliness and accuracy. This study aimed to develop an early AL risk prediction model through machine learning-driven integration of multidimensional clinical data.MethodsWe retrospectively enrolled 1588 patients undergoing radical gastrectomy at two tertiary medical centers. AL diagnosis adhered to international consensus criteria. Thirty-six perioperative features were analyzed, including demographics, comorbidities, tumor pathology characteristics, surgical parameters, and dynamic laboratory indicators (assessed at preoperative days 4-6, ≤3 days preoperatively, and ≤3 days postoperatively). LASSO regression identified 11 core predictors; five machine learning models were optimized through 5-fold cross-validation with external validation in an independent cohort.ResultsThe LASSO-Logistic model identified key predictors: CRP ≤3 days postoperatively (β = 0.54), age group (β = 0.43), history of abdominal surgery (β = 0.40), and albumin (β = -0.37). The model demonstrated optimal external validation performance (AUC = 0.871; sensitivity = 71.2%; specificity = 87.3%; negative predictive value [NPV] = 96.9%). In sensitivity-optimized mode (threshold = 0.250), NPV increased to 98.9% (sensitivity = 93.2%).ConclusionThe LASSO-Logistic model, utilizing postoperative CRP (within 3 days) as its core predictor, provides precise early warning for anastomotic leakage risk. External validation demonstrated moderate generalizability with an AUC difference of 0.054 between training and validation sets. Multicenter validation remains essential for clinical translation.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Anastomotic Leak; Stomach Neoplasms; Male; Female; Gastrectomy; Retrospective Studies; Machine Learning; Middle Aged; Aged; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Predictive Value of Tests

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)