Assessment of liver stiffness measurement-related markers in predicting liver-related events in viral cirrhosis with clinically significant portal hypertension.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
598 patients were included, and 319 patients (53.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Among the different LREs, LPR was superior to LSM and LAR in predicting liver decompensation, while the difference in predicting hepatocellular carcinoma and liver-related death was relatively small. [CONCLUSION] LPR is superior to LSM and LAR in predicting LREs in compensated viral cirrhosis patients with CSPH, especially in predicting liver decompensation.
[BACKGROUND] Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) is a crucial prognostic determinant for liver-related events (LREs) in patients with compensated viral cirrhosis.
APA
Li YQ, Li YQ, et al. (2025). Assessment of liver stiffness measurement-related markers in predicting liver-related events in viral cirrhosis with clinically significant portal hypertension.. World journal of hepatology, 17(8), 109796. https://doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v17.i8.109796
MLA
Li YQ, et al.. "Assessment of liver stiffness measurement-related markers in predicting liver-related events in viral cirrhosis with clinically significant portal hypertension.." World journal of hepatology, vol. 17, no. 8, 2025, pp. 109796.
PMID
40901585 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[BACKGROUND] Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) is a crucial prognostic determinant for liver-related events (LREs) in patients with compensated viral cirrhosis. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM)-related markers may help to predict the risk of LREs.
[AIM] To evaluate the value of LSM and its composite biomarkers [LSM-platelet ratio (LPR), LSM-albumin ratio (LAR)] in predicting LREs.
[METHODS] This study retrospectively enrolled compensated viral cirrhosis patients with CSPH. The Cox regression model was employed to examine the prediction of LSM, LPR, and LAR for LREs. The model performance was assessed through receiver operating characteristic, decision curve, and time-dependent area under the curve analysis. The Kaplan-Meier curve was used to evaluate the cumulative incidence of LREs, and further stratified analysis of different LREs was performed.
[RESULTS] A total of 598 patients were included, and 319 patients (53.3%) developed LREs during follow-up. Multivariate proportional hazards modeling demonstrated that LSM, LPR, and LAR were independent predictors of LREs. LPR had better performance in predicting LREs than LAR and LSM (area under the curve = 0.780, 0.727, 0.683, respectively, all < 0.05). The cumulative incidence of LREs in the high-risk group were significantly higher than that in the low-risk group ( < 0.001). Among the different LREs, LPR was superior to LSM and LAR in predicting liver decompensation, while the difference in predicting hepatocellular carcinoma and liver-related death was relatively small.
[CONCLUSION] LPR is superior to LSM and LAR in predicting LREs in compensated viral cirrhosis patients with CSPH, especially in predicting liver decompensation.
[AIM] To evaluate the value of LSM and its composite biomarkers [LSM-platelet ratio (LPR), LSM-albumin ratio (LAR)] in predicting LREs.
[METHODS] This study retrospectively enrolled compensated viral cirrhosis patients with CSPH. The Cox regression model was employed to examine the prediction of LSM, LPR, and LAR for LREs. The model performance was assessed through receiver operating characteristic, decision curve, and time-dependent area under the curve analysis. The Kaplan-Meier curve was used to evaluate the cumulative incidence of LREs, and further stratified analysis of different LREs was performed.
[RESULTS] A total of 598 patients were included, and 319 patients (53.3%) developed LREs during follow-up. Multivariate proportional hazards modeling demonstrated that LSM, LPR, and LAR were independent predictors of LREs. LPR had better performance in predicting LREs than LAR and LSM (area under the curve = 0.780, 0.727, 0.683, respectively, all < 0.05). The cumulative incidence of LREs in the high-risk group were significantly higher than that in the low-risk group ( < 0.001). Among the different LREs, LPR was superior to LSM and LAR in predicting liver decompensation, while the difference in predicting hepatocellular carcinoma and liver-related death was relatively small.
[CONCLUSION] LPR is superior to LSM and LAR in predicting LREs in compensated viral cirrhosis patients with CSPH, especially in predicting liver decompensation.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (4)
- [Recent advances in individualized treatment for pediatric high-risk B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia].
- Research progress of drugs targeting GPC3 in cancer therapy.
- [Exploring the advantages of traditional Chinese medicine and dual-anti therapy for liver cirrhosis].
- LINC00958/miR-627 signal axis regulates the proliferation, migration, and invasion of thyroid papillary carcinoma cells by TRIM44.
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- Discordance between vibration controlled-transient elastography and ultrasound in cirrhosis assessment: prognostic implications for liver-related events in patients with chronic hepatitis B.
- Prognostic value of liver stiffness measurement vs. biochemical response in primary biliary cholangitis.
- Noninvasive risk stratification of liver nodule development in Fontan-associated liver disease using liver stiffness measurement.
- Pre-Treatment Liver Stiffness Is a Stronger Predictor of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Development Than Post-Treatment Liver Stiffness After Hepatitis C Virus Eradication.
- Photon-counting CT-derived hepatic extracellular volume quantification for noninvasive risk stratification of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH): a prospective cohort study.
- Liver Stiffness Measured by Vibration-Controlled Transient Elastography Predicts Hepatic Decompensation in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Systemic Treatments.