Machine Learning Predictive Models for Survival in Colorectal Cancer Patients With Diabetes: A Cohort Study of 10 749 Subjects.
코호트
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
환자: T2DM from 2000 to 2020
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS] The random survival forest model provides superior survival prediction compared to other models evaluated. A validated risk score system has been established, facilitating risk stratification for clinicians to manage these patients.
[OBJECTIVES] To identify the risk factors for the survival of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), compare the predictive performance of models based on different alg
APA
Huang J, Zhong CC, et al. (2025). Machine Learning Predictive Models for Survival in Colorectal Cancer Patients With Diabetes: A Cohort Study of 10 749 Subjects.. Journal of digestive diseases, 26(11-12), 477-491. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-2980.70019
MLA
Huang J, et al.. "Machine Learning Predictive Models for Survival in Colorectal Cancer Patients With Diabetes: A Cohort Study of 10 749 Subjects.." Journal of digestive diseases, vol. 26, no. 11-12, 2025, pp. 477-491.
PMID
41309105 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[OBJECTIVES] To identify the risk factors for the survival of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), compare the predictive performance of models based on different algorithms, and develop a risk score system to predict the survival risk of the target population.
[METHODS] We analyzed data from the Hong Kong Hospital Authority Data Collaboration Laboratory (HADCL), including 10 749 CRC patients with T2DM from 2000 to 2020. We employed traditional statistical methods and machine learning algorithms to compare their performance using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was conducted to identify risk factors and attribute model outputs. A risk score system was developed using the AutoScore-Survival package for risk stratification.
[RESULTS] Key predictors of CRC survival among T2DM patients included age at cancer diagnosis, sex, T2DM duration, alcohol consumption, central obesity, hypertension, levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and serum potassium, and anti-lipid drug usage. Among the models assessed, the random survival forest showed the best performance. The risk score system was calibrated as follows: age at diagnosis, T2DM duration, LDL-C, glycated hemoglobin, creatinine, and body mass index. The AUCs for 1, 3, and 5 years of the tuned risk score system were 0.746, 0.718, and 0.677, respectively.
[CONCLUSIONS] The random survival forest model provides superior survival prediction compared to other models evaluated. A validated risk score system has been established, facilitating risk stratification for clinicians to manage these patients.
[METHODS] We analyzed data from the Hong Kong Hospital Authority Data Collaboration Laboratory (HADCL), including 10 749 CRC patients with T2DM from 2000 to 2020. We employed traditional statistical methods and machine learning algorithms to compare their performance using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was conducted to identify risk factors and attribute model outputs. A risk score system was developed using the AutoScore-Survival package for risk stratification.
[RESULTS] Key predictors of CRC survival among T2DM patients included age at cancer diagnosis, sex, T2DM duration, alcohol consumption, central obesity, hypertension, levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and serum potassium, and anti-lipid drug usage. Among the models assessed, the random survival forest showed the best performance. The risk score system was calibrated as follows: age at diagnosis, T2DM duration, LDL-C, glycated hemoglobin, creatinine, and body mass index. The AUCs for 1, 3, and 5 years of the tuned risk score system were 0.746, 0.718, and 0.677, respectively.
[CONCLUSIONS] The random survival forest model provides superior survival prediction compared to other models evaluated. A validated risk score system has been established, facilitating risk stratification for clinicians to manage these patients.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)
- Secondary Upper Blepharoplasty: Converting Static Folds Into Dynamic Folds.
- Performance of contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT to predict nipple-areolar complex involvement in early-stage breast cancer.
- The Effect of Standardized Postoperative Neck and Orofacial Rehabilitation Exercise on Quality of Life in Post-Thyroidectomy Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
- A novel whole cancer cell vaccine based on modified β-glucan elicits robust anti-tumor immunity.
- Increased IL4I1 expression predicts poor survival and modulates the immune microenvironment in acute myeloid leukemia.
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Comprehensive analysis of androgen receptor splice variant target gene expression in prostate cancer.
- Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Surgery for Thyroid Cancer.