Performance of contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT to predict nipple-areolar complex involvement in early-stage breast cancer.
[OBJECTIVES] To evaluate the diagnostic performance of preoperative contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT (CE-CBBCT) and identify significant predictors of nipple-areolar complex (NAC) involvement in
- p-value p = 0.001
- p-value p = 0.02
- Sensitivity 96.70%
- Specificity 70.33%
APA
Huang J, He N, et al. (2026). Performance of contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT to predict nipple-areolar complex involvement in early-stage breast cancer.. European radiology, 36(1), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11787-8
MLA
Huang J, et al.. "Performance of contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT to predict nipple-areolar complex involvement in early-stage breast cancer.." European radiology, vol. 36, no. 1, 2026, pp. 45-54.
PMID
40593168
Abstract
[OBJECTIVES] To evaluate the diagnostic performance of preoperative contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT (CE-CBBCT) and identify significant predictors of nipple-areolar complex (NAC) involvement in early-stage breast cancer patients.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] This retrospective study included 641 breast cancer cases from 631 patients at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (2019.3-2021.3). From these, 182 cases were selected after one-by-one matching with the NAC involvement group using the propensity score matching method. Two radiologists independently assessed CE-CBBCT imaging factors in 182 cases. Diagnostic performance indices were analyzed, and predictors of NAC involvement in breast cancer were identified using logistic regression analyses.
[RESULTS] The 182 matched cases were females with a median age of 50 (interquartile range, 44-55; range, 25-81 years). Interobserver agreement regarding CBBCT prediction by two radiologists was relatively substantial (κ = 0.730). The accuracy of radiologists in predicting NAC involvement in CE-CBBCT was 83.52% (152/182), with a sensitivity of 96.70% (88/91), specificity of 70.33% (64/91), negative predictive value of 95.52% (64/67), and positive predictive value (PPV) of 76.52% (88/115). On CE-CBBCT, asymmetric NAC enhancement (odds ratio, 5.279; p = 0.001) and TNE (tumor-nipple enhancement) within 2 cm of the NAC (odds ratio, 4.184; p = 0.02) were significant predictors of NAC involvement. When asymmetric NAC enhancement and TNE extending to the NAC were present, the PPV was 82.35% (56/68).
[CONCLUSIONS] CE-CBBCT is a safe and non-invasive modality with comparably high accuracy for the preoperative diagnosis of NAC involvement. Asymmetric NAC enhancement and TNE within 2 cm of the NAC performed well in predicting NAC involvement.
[KEY POINTS] Question Several imaging modalities have been studied to preoperatively evaluate NAC involvement, but CE-CBBCT's performance was unknown. Findings CE-CBBCT showed high accuracy in diagnosing NAC involvement. Asymmetric NAC enhancement and tumor-nipple enhancement within 2 cm of the NAC were independent predictors of NAC involvement. Clinical relevance CE-CBBCT can serve as a safe, non-invasive modality to diagnose NAC involvement preoperatively and help to identify candidates for nipple-sparing mastectomy.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] This retrospective study included 641 breast cancer cases from 631 patients at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (2019.3-2021.3). From these, 182 cases were selected after one-by-one matching with the NAC involvement group using the propensity score matching method. Two radiologists independently assessed CE-CBBCT imaging factors in 182 cases. Diagnostic performance indices were analyzed, and predictors of NAC involvement in breast cancer were identified using logistic regression analyses.
[RESULTS] The 182 matched cases were females with a median age of 50 (interquartile range, 44-55; range, 25-81 years). Interobserver agreement regarding CBBCT prediction by two radiologists was relatively substantial (κ = 0.730). The accuracy of radiologists in predicting NAC involvement in CE-CBBCT was 83.52% (152/182), with a sensitivity of 96.70% (88/91), specificity of 70.33% (64/91), negative predictive value of 95.52% (64/67), and positive predictive value (PPV) of 76.52% (88/115). On CE-CBBCT, asymmetric NAC enhancement (odds ratio, 5.279; p = 0.001) and TNE (tumor-nipple enhancement) within 2 cm of the NAC (odds ratio, 4.184; p = 0.02) were significant predictors of NAC involvement. When asymmetric NAC enhancement and TNE extending to the NAC were present, the PPV was 82.35% (56/68).
[CONCLUSIONS] CE-CBBCT is a safe and non-invasive modality with comparably high accuracy for the preoperative diagnosis of NAC involvement. Asymmetric NAC enhancement and TNE within 2 cm of the NAC performed well in predicting NAC involvement.
[KEY POINTS] Question Several imaging modalities have been studied to preoperatively evaluate NAC involvement, but CE-CBBCT's performance was unknown. Findings CE-CBBCT showed high accuracy in diagnosing NAC involvement. Asymmetric NAC enhancement and tumor-nipple enhancement within 2 cm of the NAC were independent predictors of NAC involvement. Clinical relevance CE-CBBCT can serve as a safe, non-invasive modality to diagnose NAC involvement preoperatively and help to identify candidates for nipple-sparing mastectomy.
MeSH Terms
Humans; Female; Middle Aged; Breast Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Aged; Adult; Contrast Media; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; Nipples; Aged, 80 and over; Sensitivity and Specificity; Neoplasm Staging; Predictive Value of Tests; Radiographic Image Enhancement
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)
- Secondary Upper Blepharoplasty: Converting Static Folds Into Dynamic Folds.
- The Effect of Standardized Postoperative Neck and Orofacial Rehabilitation Exercise on Quality of Life in Post-Thyroidectomy Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
- A novel whole cancer cell vaccine based on modified β-glucan elicits robust anti-tumor immunity.
- Increased IL4I1 expression predicts poor survival and modulates the immune microenvironment in acute myeloid leukemia.
- Amide proton transfer-weighted imaging in predicting aggressiveness of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with diffusion-weighted imaging.