본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and CT/MRI in Transarterial Chemoembolization and Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy.

1/5 보강
Ultrasound in medicine & biology 📖 저널 OA 5% 2021: 0/1 OA 2022: 0/2 OA 2024: 0/1 OA 2025: 0/12 OA 2026: 1/19 OA 2021~2026 2026 Vol.52(3) p. 608-615
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
154 patients with 167 observations were ultimately included.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
TACE or HAIC between 2010 and 2024
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Additionally, CEUS showed comparable results between HAIC and TACE groups in both sensitivity (98% vs 94%, p = 0.61) and specificity (50% vs 77%, p = 0.35). [CONCLUSION] CEUS demonstrated no significant difference in diagnostic performance compared with CT/MRI in evaluating HCC treatment response to HAIC and TACE.

Kong W, Qiu L, Li Q, Huang Z, Li L, He N

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[OBJECTIVE] Early assessment of treatment response following locoregional therapy remains a challenge in managing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p = 0.07
  • Sensitivity 96%
  • Specificity 67%

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Kong W, Qiu L, et al. (2026). Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and CT/MRI in Transarterial Chemoembolization and Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy.. Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 52(3), 608-615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.11.007
MLA Kong W, et al.. "Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and CT/MRI in Transarterial Chemoembolization and Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy.." Ultrasound in medicine & biology, vol. 52, no. 3, 2026, pp. 608-615.
PMID 41353068 ↗

Abstract

[OBJECTIVE] Early assessment of treatment response following locoregional therapy remains a challenge in managing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recent advancements in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) have demonstrated significant potential in the early assessment of tumor viability. This study compared the evaluation capabilities of CEUS and CT/MRI in assessing treatment response to hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).

[MATERIALS AND METHODS] This study included patients who had received TACE or HAIC between 2010 and 2024. 1:1 propensity score matching was used to reduce confounding bias between the TACE and HAIC groups. A comparative analysis was carried out using pathological complete response of treated lesions as the reference standard to assess the diagnostic performance of CEUS and CT/MRI across different treatment strategies.

[RESULTS] A total of 154 patients with 167 observations were ultimately included. In the propensity score matching cohort, CEUS and CT/MRI demonstrated similar diagnostic performance, with no significant differences in sensitivity (96% vs 92%, p = 0.07) or specificity (67% vs 57%, p > 0.99). Additionally, CEUS showed comparable results between HAIC and TACE groups in both sensitivity (98% vs 94%, p = 0.61) and specificity (50% vs 77%, p = 0.35).

[CONCLUSION] CEUS demonstrated no significant difference in diagnostic performance compared with CT/MRI in evaluating HCC treatment response to HAIC and TACE.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

… 외 1개

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반