본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-based first-line therapies for advanced or unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.

메타분석 1/5 보강
Therapeutic advances in medical oncology 📖 저널 OA 100% 2022: 3/3 OA 2023: 2/2 OA 2024: 9/9 OA 2025: 70/70 OA 2026: 47/47 OA 2022~2026 2026 Vol.18() p. 17588359261417630
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
7289 patients.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
In the United States, current ICI-based therapies are not cost-effective at existing prices. These findings may inform treatment selection and health policy decision-making in different healthcare systems.

Qi H, Huang Y, Zhang W, Li J, Wang T, Ying Y

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the treatment landscape of advanced or unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 연구 설계 meta-analysis

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Qi H, Huang Y, et al. (2026). Immune checkpoint inhibitor-based first-line therapies for advanced or unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.. Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 18, 17588359261417630. https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359261417630
MLA Qi H, et al.. "Immune checkpoint inhibitor-based first-line therapies for advanced or unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.." Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, vol. 18, 2026, pp. 17588359261417630.
PMID 41804358 ↗

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the treatment landscape of advanced or unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the comparative clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of various ICI-based combination therapies remain unclear.

[OBJECTIVES] This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and clinical efficacy of the 12 first-line ICI-based therapies for advanced or unresectable HCC under two distinct healthcare systems-China and the United States.

[DESIGN] A model-based pharmacoeconomic analysis.

[METHODS] A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to compare first-line ICI-based therapies in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). A partitioned survival model with three health states (progression-free, progressive disease, death) was developed for cost-effectiveness analysis. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were primary outcomes. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess model uncertainty.

[RESULTS] The NMA included 11 randomized clinical trials comprising 7289 patients. Four ICI-based regimens (atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, camrelizumab plus rivoceranib, sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar, and penpulimab plus anlotinib) were associated with significantly improved OS and PFS compared with sorafenib. In China, camrelizumab plus rivoceranib and tislelizumab were cost-effective compared with sorafenib, with ICERs of $17,624.64 and $1971.14 per QALY, respectively. In the United States, no ICI-based therapy was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000 per QALY; sorafenib remained the most cost-effective option. ICERs were most sensitive to drug costs, utility values, and discount rates.

[CONCLUSION] Camrelizumab plus rivoceranib represents a cost-effective first-line therapy for advanced or unresectable HCC in China. In the United States, current ICI-based therapies are not cost-effective at existing prices. These findings may inform treatment selection and health policy decision-making in different healthcare systems.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기