Magnetic Resonance Elastography Versus Shear Wave Elastography in Chronic Liver Disease.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 4/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
40 patients diagnosed with CLD.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
Magnetic Resonance Elastography
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
Shear Wave Elastography in Chronic Liver Disease
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
MRE was particularly effective in patients with chronic viral hepatitis without chronic kidney disease (AUROC: 1.000) and outperformed ElastPQ in detecting significant fibrosis. [CONCLUSION] MRE is more sensitive than ultrasound elastography in detecting significant liver fibrosis, which is crucial for guiding timely intervention.
[BACKGROUND/AIMS] Chronic liver diseases (CLDs) present significant global health challenges due to their potential progression to severe conditions, including hepatic fibrosis and hepatocellular carc
APA
Singh J, Singh T, et al. (2026). Magnetic Resonance Elastography Versus Shear Wave Elastography in Chronic Liver Disease.. Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology, 16(4), 103535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jceh.2026.103535
MLA
Singh J, et al.. "Magnetic Resonance Elastography Versus Shear Wave Elastography in Chronic Liver Disease.." Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology, vol. 16, no. 4, 2026, pp. 103535.
PMID
42004532 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[BACKGROUND/AIMS] Chronic liver diseases (CLDs) present significant global health challenges due to their potential progression to severe conditions, including hepatic fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma Accurate and timely assessment of liver fibrosis is crucial for managing these diseases effectively. Liver biopsy has limitations prompting interest in non-invasive alternatives like elastography. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and point shear wave elastography (SWE) (ElastPQ) in assessing liver fibrosis in patients with CLDs.
[METHODS] We conducted a prospective observational study involving 40 patients diagnosed with CLD. The patients were categorized into four distinct groups: chronic hepatitis B, chronic hepatitis C, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, and autoimmune hepatitis. Participants underwent liver biopsy, and liver stiffness was measured using MRE and SWE (ElastPQ), with stiffness quantified in kilopascals. Biopsy samples were evaluated histopathologically using the METAVIR scoring system. Statistical analyses compared means and assessed diagnostic accuracy and correlations between variables.
[RESULTS] MRE exhibited superior diagnostic accuracy for any fibrosis (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC]: 0.966), significant fibrosis (AUROC: 0.928), and severe fibrosis (AUROC: 0.902) compared to ElastPQ, which had AUROCs of 0.768, 0.737, and 0.809, respectively. There was a significant positive correlation observed between MRE measurements and fibrosis stage (ρ = 0.844, < 0.001). MRE was particularly effective in patients with chronic viral hepatitis without chronic kidney disease (AUROC: 1.000) and outperformed ElastPQ in detecting significant fibrosis.
[CONCLUSION] MRE is more sensitive than ultrasound elastography in detecting significant liver fibrosis, which is crucial for guiding timely intervention.
[METHODS] We conducted a prospective observational study involving 40 patients diagnosed with CLD. The patients were categorized into four distinct groups: chronic hepatitis B, chronic hepatitis C, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, and autoimmune hepatitis. Participants underwent liver biopsy, and liver stiffness was measured using MRE and SWE (ElastPQ), with stiffness quantified in kilopascals. Biopsy samples were evaluated histopathologically using the METAVIR scoring system. Statistical analyses compared means and assessed diagnostic accuracy and correlations between variables.
[RESULTS] MRE exhibited superior diagnostic accuracy for any fibrosis (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC]: 0.966), significant fibrosis (AUROC: 0.928), and severe fibrosis (AUROC: 0.902) compared to ElastPQ, which had AUROCs of 0.768, 0.737, and 0.809, respectively. There was a significant positive correlation observed between MRE measurements and fibrosis stage (ρ = 0.844, < 0.001). MRE was particularly effective in patients with chronic viral hepatitis without chronic kidney disease (AUROC: 1.000) and outperformed ElastPQ in detecting significant fibrosis.
[CONCLUSION] MRE is more sensitive than ultrasound elastography in detecting significant liver fibrosis, which is crucial for guiding timely intervention.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (3)
- Artificial intelligence in breast cancer: clinical applications in diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutics.
- Commentary on "Factors associated with emergency free flap reoperation in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction: A population-based cohort study".
- Chronic Pulmonary Silicone Embolism from Breast Augmentation Is Not a Common Finding in Explanted Lungs.
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- CAR-T cells targeting activated hepatic stellate cells ameliorate liver fibrosis in mouse models.
- Diagnostic Challenge of a Vascular Liver Tumor With Pulmonary Hemorrhagic Metastases: A Case Report.
- Non-invasive tests to guide hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance.
- The dual roles of natural killer cells in liver immunity and tolerance: Implications for health and disease.
- Integrated multi-omics, spatial profiling and organoid modeling drive transformative advances in chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma immunomicroenvironment research.
- Insulin Growth Factor Binding Protein-6 and the Liver.