Income, treatment patterns and outcome in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer.
2/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
666 patients, with respectively 33%, 35% and 32% having higher, intermediate and lower income.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
lower income: 0.95, [95%CI 0.92-0.99]). [CONCLUSIONS] Patients with higher income were more likely to receive tumour directed treatment, including curative intent treatment which may result in the observed longer survival.
OpenAlex 토픽 ·
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
[INTRODUCTION] This study explores the association between income and patient- and treatment characteristics, diagnosis through screening and survival of patients with synchronous metastasized CRC.
- p-value p < 0.001
- 95% CI 0.90-0.97
APA
Laskarina J.K. Galanos, Marloes A.G. Elferink, et al. (2026). Income, treatment patterns and outcome in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer.. European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 240, 116732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2026.116732
MLA
Laskarina J.K. Galanos, et al.. "Income, treatment patterns and outcome in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer.." European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), vol. 240, 2026, pp. 116732.
PMID
41966682 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[INTRODUCTION] This study explores the association between income and patient- and treatment characteristics, diagnosis through screening and survival of patients with synchronous metastasized CRC.
[METHODS] Patients diagnosed with stage IV CRC between 2015 and 2023 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Income at postal code level was used (Statistics Netherlands). Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine the association between income and treatment. Crude relative survival stratified for income was calculated, as well as relative excess risks of death using a multivariable generalized linear model.
[RESULTS] The study included 24,666 patients, with respectively 33%, 35% and 32% having higher, intermediate and lower income. Detection through screening was more often realized in the higher income group compared to intermediate and lower income (9% vs. 8% vs.6%, p < 0.001). Among patients with single-organ metastases, higher income patients were more often treated with curative intent for metastases to the liver (40% vs. 35% vs. 29%, p < 0.001) and peritoneum (36% vs. 29% vs.22%, p < 0.001) compared to intermediate or lower income, also in multivariable analyses. Similarly, systemic therapy was given more frequently to patients with higher income than those with intermediate or lower income (56% vs. 51% vs.42%, p < 0.001). Crude 3-year relative survival was 21% (lower), 22% (intermediate) and 26% (higher income, adjusted RER higher vs. lower income: 0.93, [95%CI 0.90-0.97]; intermediate vs. lower income: 0.95, [95%CI 0.92-0.99]).
[CONCLUSIONS] Patients with higher income were more likely to receive tumour directed treatment, including curative intent treatment which may result in the observed longer survival.
[METHODS] Patients diagnosed with stage IV CRC between 2015 and 2023 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Income at postal code level was used (Statistics Netherlands). Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine the association between income and treatment. Crude relative survival stratified for income was calculated, as well as relative excess risks of death using a multivariable generalized linear model.
[RESULTS] The study included 24,666 patients, with respectively 33%, 35% and 32% having higher, intermediate and lower income. Detection through screening was more often realized in the higher income group compared to intermediate and lower income (9% vs. 8% vs.6%, p < 0.001). Among patients with single-organ metastases, higher income patients were more often treated with curative intent for metastases to the liver (40% vs. 35% vs. 29%, p < 0.001) and peritoneum (36% vs. 29% vs.22%, p < 0.001) compared to intermediate or lower income, also in multivariable analyses. Similarly, systemic therapy was given more frequently to patients with higher income than those with intermediate or lower income (56% vs. 51% vs.42%, p < 0.001). Crude 3-year relative survival was 21% (lower), 22% (intermediate) and 26% (higher income, adjusted RER higher vs. lower income: 0.93, [95%CI 0.90-0.97]; intermediate vs. lower income: 0.95, [95%CI 0.92-0.99]).
[CONCLUSIONS] Patients with higher income were more likely to receive tumour directed treatment, including curative intent treatment which may result in the observed longer survival.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- Mucinous histology and resistance to immune checkpoint blockade in patients with microsatellite instability-high metastatic colorectal cancer.
- A pipeline of machine learning-driven multi-modal data fusion methods for prognostic risk analysis in bevacizumab-treated metastatic colorectal cancer.
- Precision conversion of colorectal cancer lung metastases: A personalized quadruplet regimen integrating photodynamic therapy with targeted, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy.
- Metastatic Colorectal Cancer as a Chronic Disease: Twelve-Year Survival After Initially Unresectable Bilobar Liver Metastases.
- Safety and Feasibility of Robotic Simultaneous Resection of Synchronous Colorectal Cancer and Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
- Clinical outcomes of treatments for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis.