Neoadjuvant nonablative stereotactic body radiotherapy plus immunotherapy yields similar pathologic response as chemoimmunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
39 patients received chemoimmunotherapy, and 26 patients received stereotactic body radiotherapy plus immunotherapy.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy plus immunotherapy followed by resection
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
추출되지 않음
[OBJECTIVE] Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy is currently the standard of care for clinical stages IB (≥4 cm) to IIIB (N2) non-small cell lung cancer without EGFR or ALK alterations.
- p-value P = .01
- 추적기간 14.7 months
APA
Jones D, Nasar A, et al. (2025). Neoadjuvant nonablative stereotactic body radiotherapy plus immunotherapy yields similar pathologic response as chemoimmunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 170(6), 1795-1802.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.07.014
MLA
Jones D, et al.. "Neoadjuvant nonablative stereotactic body radiotherapy plus immunotherapy yields similar pathologic response as chemoimmunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.." The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, vol. 170, no. 6, 2025, pp. 1795-1802.e2.
PMID
40684849 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[OBJECTIVE] Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy is currently the standard of care for clinical stages IB (≥4 cm) to IIIB (N2) non-small cell lung cancer without EGFR or ALK alterations. We previously reported results from a phase II trial comparing neoadjuvant immunotherapy alone with nonablative stereotactic body radiotherapy plus immunotherapy. In this article, we compare the oncological outcomes associated with stereotactic body radiotherapy plus immunotherapy with those after chemoimmunotherapy in surgically resected patients.
[METHODS] We retrospectively reviewed our institutional database to identify patients with non-small cell lung cancer who received neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy plus immunotherapy followed by resection. The primary end point was major pathologic response. Secondary end points were pathologic complete response, nodal downstaging, postoperative adverse events, and survival. Intergroup differences in pathologic response were compared by contingency analysis. Survival was assessed by the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model.
[RESULTS] Sixty-five patients were identified between January 2017 and December 2024; 39 patients received chemoimmunotherapy, and 26 patients received stereotactic body radiotherapy plus immunotherapy. Baseline characteristics were largely similar. Major pathologic response occurred in 51.3% of patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy and 61.5% of patients receiving stereotactic body radiotherapy plus immunotherapy (P = .67). Pathologic complete response occurred in 30.8% of each group (P = 1.0). Nodal downstaging (cN1/N2 to pN0) rates were 71.4% (20/28) after chemoimmunotherapy and 68.8% (11/16) after stereotactic body radiotherapy plus immunotherapy. Postoperative adverse events were similar. There was no 90-day mortality. Median follow-up was 14.7 months after chemoimmunotherapy and 66.5 months after stereotactic body radiotherapy plus immunotherapy. Although overall survival was similar, recurrence-free survival was improved with stereotactic body radiotherapy plus immunotherapy (2-year recurrence-free survival: chemoimmunotherapy 64.4% vs stereotactic body radiotherapy plus immunotherapy 83.3%, P = .01).
[CONCLUSIONS] In this single-institution retrospective study, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy plus immunotherapy were associated with similar depths of pathologic response, nodal downstaging, postoperative adverse events, and overall survival. Stereotactic body radiotherapy plus immunotherapy was associated with a significant improvement in recurrence-free survival.
[METHODS] We retrospectively reviewed our institutional database to identify patients with non-small cell lung cancer who received neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy plus immunotherapy followed by resection. The primary end point was major pathologic response. Secondary end points were pathologic complete response, nodal downstaging, postoperative adverse events, and survival. Intergroup differences in pathologic response were compared by contingency analysis. Survival was assessed by the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model.
[RESULTS] Sixty-five patients were identified between January 2017 and December 2024; 39 patients received chemoimmunotherapy, and 26 patients received stereotactic body radiotherapy plus immunotherapy. Baseline characteristics were largely similar. Major pathologic response occurred in 51.3% of patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy and 61.5% of patients receiving stereotactic body radiotherapy plus immunotherapy (P = .67). Pathologic complete response occurred in 30.8% of each group (P = 1.0). Nodal downstaging (cN1/N2 to pN0) rates were 71.4% (20/28) after chemoimmunotherapy and 68.8% (11/16) after stereotactic body radiotherapy plus immunotherapy. Postoperative adverse events were similar. There was no 90-day mortality. Median follow-up was 14.7 months after chemoimmunotherapy and 66.5 months after stereotactic body radiotherapy plus immunotherapy. Although overall survival was similar, recurrence-free survival was improved with stereotactic body radiotherapy plus immunotherapy (2-year recurrence-free survival: chemoimmunotherapy 64.4% vs stereotactic body radiotherapy plus immunotherapy 83.3%, P = .01).
[CONCLUSIONS] In this single-institution retrospective study, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy plus immunotherapy were associated with similar depths of pathologic response, nodal downstaging, postoperative adverse events, and overall survival. Stereotactic body radiotherapy plus immunotherapy was associated with a significant improvement in recurrence-free survival.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (4)
- Volumizing hyaluronic acid filler for midface volume deficit: 2-year results from a pivotal single-blind randomized controlled study.
- Safety and Effectiveness of Hyaluronic Acid Filler, VYC-20L, via Cannula for Cheek Augmentation: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Controlled Study.
- A Randomized, Comparator-Controlled Study of HARC for Cheek Augmentation and Correction of Midface Contour Deficiencies.
- High-grade spindle cell sarcoma arising in rhytidectomy scar: a case report.
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Surgery for Thyroid Cancer.
- Association of patient health education with the postoperative health related quality of life in low- intermediate recurrence risk differentiated thyroid cancer patients.