A Randomized, Comparator-Controlled Study of HARC for Cheek Augmentation and Correction of Midface Contour Deficiencies.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] HARC is a soft and flexible hyaluronic acid filler containing lidocaine, manufactured using XpresHAn® technology, restoring natural-looking volume and soft contours.
[OBJECTIVES] To evaluate safety and effectiveness of HARC for cheek augmentation and correction of midface contour deficiencies compared to a control product HAJV (hereafter referred to as Control). Primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority of HARC compared to the Control, by blinded evaluation of change from baseline in midface fullness 12 weeks after last injection, using a 4 grade midface volume scale (MMVS).
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] Subjects over the age of 21 with loss of fullness in the midface area (MMVS score 2, 3, or 4) were randomized 2:1 to treatment with HARC(n=142) or Control (n=68). Optional touch-up was allowed after 4 weeks. Study assessments included MMVS, aesthetic improvement, subject satisfaction, and safety. Subjects were followed for 48 weeks.
[RESULTS] Overall, most subjects were female (89%) and mean age was 53 years (range 24-80). Total mean volume injected was 4.3 mL for HARC and 4.9 mL for Control. Primary objective was met; mean change from baseline in MMVS score at week 12: -1.4 (HARC), -1.3 (Control), 95% CI: -0.22, 0.06. HARC effectiveness was supported by a high degree of aesthetic improvement and subject satisfaction throughout 48 weeks. Related adverse events were generally mild and transient.
[CONCLUSIONS] HARC was well tolerated and non-inferior to Control for correction of midface fullness at 12 weeks after last injection. Aesthetic improvement and subject satisfaction were high and lasted through week 48. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(9):949-956. doi:10.36849/JDD.6191.
[OBJECTIVES] To evaluate safety and effectiveness of HARC for cheek augmentation and correction of midface contour deficiencies compared to a control product HAJV (hereafter referred to as Control). Primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority of HARC compared to the Control, by blinded evaluation of change from baseline in midface fullness 12 weeks after last injection, using a 4 grade midface volume scale (MMVS).
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] Subjects over the age of 21 with loss of fullness in the midface area (MMVS score 2, 3, or 4) were randomized 2:1 to treatment with HARC(n=142) or Control (n=68). Optional touch-up was allowed after 4 weeks. Study assessments included MMVS, aesthetic improvement, subject satisfaction, and safety. Subjects were followed for 48 weeks.
[RESULTS] Overall, most subjects were female (89%) and mean age was 53 years (range 24-80). Total mean volume injected was 4.3 mL for HARC and 4.9 mL for Control. Primary objective was met; mean change from baseline in MMVS score at week 12: -1.4 (HARC), -1.3 (Control), 95% CI: -0.22, 0.06. HARC effectiveness was supported by a high degree of aesthetic improvement and subject satisfaction throughout 48 weeks. Related adverse events were generally mild and transient.
[CONCLUSIONS] HARC was well tolerated and non-inferior to Control for correction of midface fullness at 12 weeks after last injection. Aesthetic improvement and subject satisfaction were high and lasted through week 48. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(9):949-956. doi:10.36849/JDD.6191.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | hyaluronic acid filler
|
필러 주입술 | dict | 1 | |
| 재료 | hyaluronic acid
|
히알루론산 | dict | 1 | |
| 약물 | lidocaine
|
리도카인 | dict | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cheek; Cosmetic Techniques; Dermal Fillers; Esthetics; Female; Humans; Hyaluronic Acid; Lidocaine; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Skin Aging; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Local therapeutic strategies for neurocutaneous dysesthesia: from capsaicin to cannabinoids.
- Comparative effects of pharmacological interventions in the prophylactic treatment of tension-type headache: systematic review and network meta-analysis.
- Penetrating globe injury following periocular hyaluronic acid filler injection: A case report.
- Choroidal ischemia after self-injection of hyaluronic acid filler.
- Intra-articular therapies for synovial joint dysfunction: a comprehensive integrative review.