본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Prognostic utility of cachexia in lung cancer: A multicenter cohort analysis.

1/5 보강
Clinical nutrition ESPEN 📖 저널 OA 9.5% 2024: 0/3 OA 2025: 0/23 OA 2026: 4/16 OA 2024~2026 2025 Vol.70() p. 463-470
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
환자: AWGC-defined cachexia had significantly poorer survival (55
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
30.0 %, p < 0.001). [CONCLUSIONS] AWGC-defined cachexia is an independent risk factor for both long-term prognosis and 90-day mortality in lung cancer patients.

Wei L, Ruan G, Zhang H, Shi H, Xie H

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] The clinical significance of the Asian Working Group on Cachexia (AWGC) criteria, as a novel diagnostic standard for cachexia, remains underexplored.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p < 0.001
  • 95% CI 1.306-1.580
  • OR 3.060
  • HR 1.436

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Wei L, Ruan G, et al. (2025). Prognostic utility of cachexia in lung cancer: A multicenter cohort analysis.. Clinical nutrition ESPEN, 70, 463-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.10.017
MLA Wei L, et al.. "Prognostic utility of cachexia in lung cancer: A multicenter cohort analysis.." Clinical nutrition ESPEN, vol. 70, 2025, pp. 463-470.
PMID 41173213 ↗

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] The clinical significance of the Asian Working Group on Cachexia (AWGC) criteria, as a novel diagnostic standard for cachexia, remains underexplored. This study aims to investigate the prognostic value of the AWGC criteria and to propose a scoring system for stratifying the severity of cachexia in lung cancer patients.

[METHODS] Survival curves were generated using Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazards models were employed for survival analysis, providing hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Logistic regression analysis was utilized to assess the independent association between cachexia and 90-day mortality, presenting the results as odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % CIs.

[RESULTS] This study enrolled a total of 3,424 lung cancer patients, comprising 86.6 % with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 13.4 % with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Patients with AWGC-defined cachexia had significantly poorer survival (55.8 % vs. 39.3 %, p < 0.001). Cachectic patients exhibited considerably worse survival rates in both SCLC (42.9 % vs. 25.4 %, p < 0.001) and NSCLC (57.8 % vs. 41.4 %, p < 0.001). Cox regression analysis indicated that AWGC-defined cachexia is an independent risk factor for survival in lung cancer patients (HR: 1.436, 95 % CI: 1.306-1.580, p < 0.001). Moreover, AWGC-defined cachexia was significantly associated with poor prognosis in both SCLC (HR: 1.307, 95 % CI: 1.007-1.698, p = 0.044) and NSCLC (HR: 1.377, 95 % CI: 1.234-1.538, p < 0.001) patients. AWGC-defined cachexia was also found to be an independent risk factor for 90-day mortality in lung cancer patients (OR = 3.060, 95 % CI: 2.254-4.155, p < 0.001). We developed a severity grading system for categorizing cachexia into Mild, Moderate, and Severe. Survival rates gradually decreased as the severity grading score increased (63.2 % vs. 49.1 % vs. 37.0 % vs. 30.0 %, p < 0.001).

[CONCLUSIONS] AWGC-defined cachexia is an independent risk factor for both long-term prognosis and 90-day mortality in lung cancer patients.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반