The Counseling and Shared Decision-Making Visit for Lung Cancer Screening: A Thematic Analysis of Public Comments to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services During the 2021-2022 National Coverage Analysis Process.
1/5 보강
[BACKGROUND] Uptake of lung cancer screening (LCS) in the United States has been limited, and some groups have argued that the unprecedented Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) coverage man
APA
Volk RJ, Maki KG, et al. (2025). The Counseling and Shared Decision-Making Visit for Lung Cancer Screening: A Thematic Analysis of Public Comments to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services During the 2021-2022 National Coverage Analysis Process.. Chest. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.12.016
MLA
Volk RJ, et al.. "The Counseling and Shared Decision-Making Visit for Lung Cancer Screening: A Thematic Analysis of Public Comments to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services During the 2021-2022 National Coverage Analysis Process.." Chest, 2025.
PMID
41443390 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[BACKGROUND] Uptake of lung cancer screening (LCS) in the United States has been limited, and some groups have argued that the unprecedented Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) coverage mandate for shared decision-making (SDM) contributed to the low screening rates. Late in 2021, the CMS initiated an update of its LCS coverage determination, which included 2 public comment periods.
[RESEARCH QUESTION] What comments were offered by the public about SDM in response to the proposed CMS update and how did CMS address commenters' concerns?
[STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS] Public comments on SDM from the 2 periods were downloaded into a searchable database and commenter affiliations were categorized. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the verbatim comments.
[RESULTS] A total of 170 comments were submitted during the initial comment period and 49 during the second, with the largest number coming from individuals affiliated with radiology and/or LCS programs. Ninety-one comments addressed SDM. Recommendations about the SDM visit included complete removal, endorsing its importance without making it mandatory, and retaining the requirement with changes to reduce its administrative burden. Objections to the required SDM visit included the following: it is a barrier to screening initiation, it is a burden for clinicians, it is not required of other cancer screening tests, and the process is too complex. Relevant evidence supporting the objections was lacking. Comments in support of SDM recognized its importance in the context of LCS while proposing changes that allow nonclinical professionals to conduct the SDM visit and allowing for telehealth visits.
[INTERPRETATION] Commenters raised concerns that the CMS requirement for SDM led to many LCS implementation challenges. In response, the coverage decision was modified to decrease the administrative burden on screening programs while retaining the patient counseling and SDM requirement.
[RESEARCH QUESTION] What comments were offered by the public about SDM in response to the proposed CMS update and how did CMS address commenters' concerns?
[STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS] Public comments on SDM from the 2 periods were downloaded into a searchable database and commenter affiliations were categorized. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the verbatim comments.
[RESULTS] A total of 170 comments were submitted during the initial comment period and 49 during the second, with the largest number coming from individuals affiliated with radiology and/or LCS programs. Ninety-one comments addressed SDM. Recommendations about the SDM visit included complete removal, endorsing its importance without making it mandatory, and retaining the requirement with changes to reduce its administrative burden. Objections to the required SDM visit included the following: it is a barrier to screening initiation, it is a burden for clinicians, it is not required of other cancer screening tests, and the process is too complex. Relevant evidence supporting the objections was lacking. Comments in support of SDM recognized its importance in the context of LCS while proposing changes that allow nonclinical professionals to conduct the SDM visit and allowing for telehealth visits.
[INTERPRETATION] Commenters raised concerns that the CMS requirement for SDM led to many LCS implementation challenges. In response, the coverage decision was modified to decrease the administrative burden on screening programs while retaining the patient counseling and SDM requirement.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- Artificial intelligence and breast cancer screening in Serbia: a dual-perspective qualitative study among radiologists and screening-aged women.
- Reforming the delivery of smoking cessation: a distributional cost-effectiveness analysis of providing smoking cessation as part of targeted lung cancer screening.
- Lung Cancer Screening in Adults: State-of-the-Art and Policy Mapping (2025).
- System-Wide Implementation of Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Value-Based Care Setting.
- The Increase of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: New Insights and Emerging Hypotheses.
- Does Messaging for Reducing Breast Cancer Overscreening in Older Women Have Differential Responses among Medical Minimizers and Maximizers?