본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Informed choice for lung cancer screening: A randomised trial of three decision support tools.

Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 2026 Vol.211() p. 108874

Dodd RH, Weber M, McFadden K, Rankin NM

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Shared decision-making in the Australian National Lung Cancer Screening Program (NLCSP) involves consultation between healthcare provider and individual to ensure participants make an informed choice

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 221
  • p-value p = 0.006

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Dodd RH, Weber M, et al. (2026). Informed choice for lung cancer screening: A randomised trial of three decision support tools.. Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 211, 108874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108874
MLA Dodd RH, et al.. "Informed choice for lung cancer screening: A randomised trial of three decision support tools.." Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), vol. 211, 2026, pp. 108874.
PMID 41371102

Abstract

Shared decision-making in the Australian National Lung Cancer Screening Program (NLCSP) involves consultation between healthcare provider and individual to ensure participants make an informed choice about screening. Three decision support tools were co-designed: a 16-page A5 booklet (booklet), 2-page A4 leaflet (leaflet) and a 3-minute animated video (video). This randomised trial evaluated the tools' ability to support informed choice, attitudes/intentions towards lung cancer screening, acceptability, comprehension, ease of understanding and balance of information of the tool. An online survey was conducted with people eligible for the Australian NLCSP. Participants were randomised to view one of the tools and completed a questionnaire. The primary outcome was informed choice (defined as adequate knowledge and congruency between attitudes and screening intentions). 715 participants completed the survey: booklet (n = 221), leaflet (n = 252) and video (n = 242). There was no statistically significant difference in informed choice between tools; informed choice was made by 148 (67 %) people who viewed the booklet, 167 (66.3 %) for the leaflet and 153 (63.2 %) for the video. Across all the tools, over 90 % found the information clear and easy to understand, around 85 % found the tool they viewed as helpful in deciding about screening, and around 80 % would recommend the viewed tool to others. Almost 80 % in each group intended to participate in lung cancer screening. Attitudes towards screening were significantly less positive for those viewing the leaflet than the booklet or video (p = 0.006). Each decision support tool was acceptable, supported informed choice, and could be adapted for use in the Australian NLCSP.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Female; Early Detection of Cancer; Middle Aged; Aged; Australia; Surveys and Questionnaires; Decision Support Techniques; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Choice Behavior; Adult; Informed Consent; Mass Screening; Pamphlets