본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

From class effects to specificity FAERS evidence and network mapping of adverse events in NSCLC targeted therapy.

International journal of surgery (London, England) 2026 Vol.112(4) p. 9520-34

Yu J, Zhu M, Zhu Y, Shu Q

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] Whether targeted therapies for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) share mechanism-driven class toxicities or mainly exhibit drug-specific risks remains unclear in real-world practice.

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Yu J, Zhu M, et al. (2026). From class effects to specificity FAERS evidence and network mapping of adverse events in NSCLC targeted therapy.. International journal of surgery (London, England), 112(4), 9520-34. https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000004704
MLA Yu J, et al.. "From class effects to specificity FAERS evidence and network mapping of adverse events in NSCLC targeted therapy.." International journal of surgery (London, England), vol. 112, no. 4, 2026, pp. 9520-34.
PMID 41563236

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Whether targeted therapies for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) share mechanism-driven class toxicities or mainly exhibit drug-specific risks remains unclear in real-world practice.

[METHODS] We analyzed reports from the U.S. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS, 2004-2025) for 14 Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved agents across five classes: EGFR, ALK, ROS1, RET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and a KRAS G12C inhibitor. Adverse events (AEs) were standardized to MedDRA v27.0 preferred terms (PTs). Primary PT-level safety signals were defined based on concordance across four disproportionality methods: proportional reporting ratio (PRR; PRR ≥ 2, x2 ≥ 4, and ≥3 reports), reporting odds ratio (ROR; lower 95% confidence interval bound ROR025 > 1), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN; IC025 > 0), and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS; EB05 ≥ 2). Cross-drug structure was evaluated via a Jaccard-based similarity network.

[RESULTS] Among 34 948 individuals, per-drug signal counts ranged from 3 to 113. EGFR-TKIs were enriched for mucocutaneous and gastrointestinal events; ALK-TKIs for metabolic and laboratory abnormalities and selected cardiac findings; and RET-TKIs for hepatotoxicity and hypertension. Osimertinib showed prominent electrocardiographic signals (e.g., QT prolongation); lorlatinib exhibited a distinctive dyslipidemia signature. Brigatinib and crizotinib aligned with creatine kinase elevation and visual effects, respectively. No single PT occurred across all 14 drugs. Recurrent cross-class PTs included increased blood pressure, QT prolongation, dry skin, and edema. The similarity network revealed tight within-class modules (EGFR, ALK), a binary RET pair, and peripheral placement of repotrectinib and adagrasib, indicating limited overlap of their AE profiles.

[CONCLUSION] This first NSCLC-focused FAERS comparison integrating four-method signal detection with network analysis delineates reproducible class effects superimposed by drug-specific toxicities. Findings support tailored monitoring (e.g., dermatologic care for EGFR-TKIs; ECG/electrolytes for osimertinib; lipid/CK surveillance for ALK-TKIs; blood pressure/liver testing for RET-TKIs) to inform risk-aware first-line decisions.

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)