본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Biomarker Testing Practices for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Survey Insights from South Korean Pathology Laboratories.

설문조사 1/5 보강
Cancer research and treatment 📖 저널 OA 62.4% 2022: 1/1 OA 2024: 3/3 OA 2025: 16/39 OA 2026: 48/66 OA 2022~2026 2026
Retraction 확인
출처

Kim S, Kim D, Kim L, Kim WS

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[PURPOSE] Molecular biomarker testing is essential for lung cancer management and precision medicine.

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Kim S, Kim D, et al. (2026). Biomarker Testing Practices for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Survey Insights from South Korean Pathology Laboratories.. Cancer research and treatment. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2025.927
MLA Kim S, et al.. "Biomarker Testing Practices for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Survey Insights from South Korean Pathology Laboratories.." Cancer research and treatment, 2026.
PMID 41612807 ↗

Abstract

[PURPOSE] Molecular biomarker testing is essential for lung cancer management and precision medicine. This study evaluated biomarker testing practices for non-small cell lung cancer across pathology laboratories in South Korea.

[MATERIALS AND METHODS] A nationwide survey of 30 pathology laboratories assessed testing policies, biomarker adoption, testing platforms, next-generation sequencing (NGS) implementation, reporting practices, turnaround times (TATs), and perceived challenges.

[RESULTS] All institutions routinely performed biomarker testing; 20 (66.7%) employed reflex testing at least in part. Tissue was the primary specimen type, and cytology and liquid biopsy specimens were accepted by 90.0% and 46.7% of institutions, respectively. For non-squamous NSCLC, all institutions tested EGFR, ALK, ROS1, and PD-L1, with additional testing for BRAF (86.7%) and KRAS (80.0%); other actionable targets were rarely tested outside NGS. In squamous NSCLC, PD-L1 was routinely assessed, whereas other drivers were tested less frequently. All institutions performed tissue-based NGS using companion diagnostic (CDx) and/or non-CDx platforms, and liquid biopsy-based NGS was available in 46.7% of institutions. Median TATs were 2-3, 5, 9, 19, and 15 days for immunohistochemistry, polymerase chain reaction, fluorescence in situ hybridization, tissue-based NGS, and liquid biopsy-based NGS, respectively. Reported barriers included limited sample availability, workforce shortages, prolonged TATs, regulatory restrictions, and lack of standardization.

[CONCLUSION] Biomarker testing is widely implemented in South Korea, with increasing integration of NGS. Despite alignment with international recommendations, systemic and policy reforms are needed to harmonize workflows, reduce variability, and optimize precision oncology.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반