본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Comparison of Robotic-Assisted and Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

코호트 1/5 보강
Annali italiani di chirurgia 2026 Vol.97(2) p. 352-363
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
환자: stage I-IIA NSCLC who underwent curative-intent anatomic lobectomy at our institution between January and December 2023
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
curative-intent anatomic lobectomy at our institution between January and December 2023
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS] Both RATS and U-VATS are safe and effective minimally invasive approaches for anatomic lobectomy in early-stage NSCLC. RATS offers advantages in operative precision, lymph node dissection, and short-term quality of life without compromising safety or early oncologic outcomes, although it is associated with increased cost.

Ni Y, Zhang J

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[AIM] This study aimed to compare perioperative outcomes, lymphadenectomy quality, postoperative recovery, pulmonary function, and short-term oncologic results between robotic-assisted thoracoscopic s

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 105
  • 연구 설계 cohort study

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Ni Y, Zhang J (2026). Comparison of Robotic-Assisted and Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.. Annali italiani di chirurgia, 97(2), 352-363. https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.4404
MLA Ni Y, et al.. "Comparison of Robotic-Assisted and Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.." Annali italiani di chirurgia, vol. 97, no. 2, 2026, pp. 352-363.
PMID 41681095
DOI 10.62713/aic.4404

Abstract

[AIM] This study aimed to compare perioperative outcomes, lymphadenectomy quality, postoperative recovery, pulmonary function, and short-term oncologic results between robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) and uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

[METHODS] This retrospective cohort study included 231 consecutive patients with stage I-IIA NSCLC who underwent curative-intent anatomic lobectomy at our institution between January and December 2023. Based on the surgical approach, patients were assigned to either the RATS group (n = 105) or the U-VATS group (n = 126). All procedures were performed by the same experienced surgical team using standardized perioperative protocols. Clinical characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative parameters, pulmonary function, and 12-month oncologic outcomes were collected for comparative evaluation.

[RESULTS] RATS resulted in shorter operative time, reduced blood loss, and increased lymph node and mediastinal station retrieval compared with U-VATS. Postoperative pain, drainage volume, length of hospital stay, and complication rates were comparable between groups. Patients undergoing RATS demonstrated significantly higher global health and functional scores, along with lower symptom scores, during the first 6 months after surgery ( < 0.05). Pulmonary function recovery, 1-year disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) did not differ significantly between the two approaches. However, hospitalization costs were higher for the RATS group ( < 0.001).

[CONCLUSIONS] Both RATS and U-VATS are safe and effective minimally invasive approaches for anatomic lobectomy in early-stage NSCLC. RATS offers advantages in operative precision, lymph node dissection, and short-term quality of life without compromising safety or early oncologic outcomes, although it is associated with increased cost.

MeSH Terms

Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Retrospective Studies; Lung Neoplasms; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Humans; Male; Pneumonectomy; Female; Middle Aged; Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Lymph Node Excision; Treatment Outcome; Operative Time; Length of Stay; Postoperative Complications

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)