본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Comparison of Postoperative Telerehabilitation and Unsupervised Home-Based Training in Older Adults With Lung Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

무작위 임상시험 1/5 보강
Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention 2026 Vol.46(2) p. 132-139
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
추출되지 않음
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
a one-time education session on standard home-based pulmonary rehabilitation at the rehabilitation center
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Our findings suggest that PTR may be a feasible therapeutic strategy for lung cancer, even in older adults.

Shin YB, Huh S, Cho JS, Hong CH, Kim Y, Shin MJ, Yun RY, Lee J, Son BS, Kim SH

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[PURPOSE] To examine the effects of postoperative pulmonary telerehabilitation (PTR) in older adults with lung cancer using a popular mobile instant messenger.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 64
  • p-value P < .001
  • 95% CI 1.9-4.8
  • 연구 설계 randomized controlled trial

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Shin YB, Huh S, et al. (2026). Comparison of Postoperative Telerehabilitation and Unsupervised Home-Based Training in Older Adults With Lung Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.. Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention, 46(2), 132-139. https://doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0000000000000988
MLA Shin YB, et al.. "Comparison of Postoperative Telerehabilitation and Unsupervised Home-Based Training in Older Adults With Lung Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.." Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention, vol. 46, no. 2, 2026, pp. 132-139.
PMID 41294889

Abstract

[PURPOSE] To examine the effects of postoperative pulmonary telerehabilitation (PTR) in older adults with lung cancer using a popular mobile instant messenger.

[METHODS] We conducted a randomized controlled trial in ambulatory patients (n = 64; aged ≥ 65 years) with lung cancer scheduled for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Participants were randomly assigned to intervention (IG) or control (CG) groups. Four weeks after surgery, both groups received a one-time education session on standard home-based pulmonary rehabilitation at the rehabilitation center. The IG underwent a PTR program thrice weekly for 4 weeks using a mobile instant messenger or telephone. Both groups were instructed to maintain their exercise routine (at least 3 times a week) during the 4-week follow-up.

[RESULTS] Compared with the CG, the IG showed significant improvements in peak oxygen uptake (VO 2peak ) and percent predicted VO 2peak of 3.3 mL/kg/min (95% CI, 1.9-4.8; P < .001) and 14% (95% CI, 7-21; P < .001), respectively, after PTR. These improvements persisted at the 4-week follow-up (VO 2peak = 3.8 mL/kg/min: 95% CI, 2.1-5.5; P < .001 and percent predicted VO 2peak = 13%: 95% CI, 6-20; P < .001). Compared with preoperative values, postoperative VO 2peak and percent predicted VO 2peak decreased significantly by 3.5 mL/kg/min (95% CI, 2.6-4.3; P < .001) and 15% (95% CI, 11-19; P < .001), respectively.

[CONCLUSIONS] A 4-week postoperative PTR program improved VO 2peak in older adults with lung cancer. Our findings suggest that PTR may be a feasible therapeutic strategy for lung cancer, even in older adults.