본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

A Randomized Phase II Trial of Hypo-fractionated Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Utilizing 2.5 Gy/Fraction Versus Standard- Fractionated IMRT, Concurrent With Carboplatin/Paclitaxel and Followed by Consolidation Durvalumab, for Subjects With Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

1/5 보강
Clinical lung cancer 📖 저널 OA 15.7% 2025: 2/26 OA 2026: 16/89 OA 2025~2026 2026 Vol.27(2) p. 98-105
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
환자: stage III non-small cell lung cancer
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
by adjacent critical structures
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
추출되지 않음

Reddy K, Wang F, Cao Y, Gan GN

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] Locoregional control remains suboptimal for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who receive standard-of-care concurrent chemoradiation, with standard-fractionated r

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Reddy K, Wang F, et al. (2026). A Randomized Phase II Trial of Hypo-fractionated Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Utilizing 2.5 Gy/Fraction Versus Standard- Fractionated IMRT, Concurrent With Carboplatin/Paclitaxel and Followed by Consolidation Durvalumab, for Subjects With Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.. Clinical lung cancer, 27(2), 98-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2025.12.004
MLA Reddy K, et al.. "A Randomized Phase II Trial of Hypo-fractionated Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Utilizing 2.5 Gy/Fraction Versus Standard- Fractionated IMRT, Concurrent With Carboplatin/Paclitaxel and Followed by Consolidation Durvalumab, for Subjects With Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.." Clinical lung cancer, vol. 27, no. 2, 2026, pp. 98-105.
PMID 41687334 ↗

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Locoregional control remains suboptimal for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who receive standard-of-care concurrent chemoradiation, with standard-fractionated radiation treatment (RT) delivered at 2 Gy/fraction. Hypo-fractionated RT is effectively used as a standard-of-care treatment option in several different cancers and allows escalation of the biological effective dose (BED) to the tumor, without increasing the overall treatment time. In NSCLC, hypo-fractionated RT regimens have been investigated in early phase trials and found to be feasible if performed with careful attention to the dose received by adjacent critical structures.

[METHODS] The study is a randomized, phase II clinical trial designed to evaluate the feasibility, toxicity and efficacy of hypo-fractionated RT to 62.5 Gy in 25 fractions (2.5 Gy/fraction) in stage III NSCLC subjects, compared to the current standard-of care 6-week RT regimen (2 Gy/fraction), with concurrent systemic chemotherapy and consolidation immunotherapy. Our primary objective is to compare locoregional control between hypo-fractionated RT versus standard fractionated RT. Secondary objectives include comparing acute and late toxicities, progression free survival, overall survival, and quality of life.

[CONCLUSIONS] This study will assess the safety and feasibility of hypo-fractionated RT at 2.5 Gy/fraction with concurrent chemotherapy and consolidation immunotherapy and is the first prospective, randomized clinical trial, to our knowledge, to compare the efficacy of hypo-fractionated RT versus standard-fractionated RT for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

… 외 4개

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반