본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Treatment planning for lung cancer reirradiation accounting for previously delivered dose.

1/5 보강
Physics and imaging in radiation oncology 📖 저널 OA 100% 2024: 2/2 OA 2025: 25/25 OA 2026: 24/24 OA 2024~2026 2026 Vol.38() p. 100912
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
6 patients, versus 3/6 with the manual method, suggesting enhanced and potentially more efficient reirradiation planning.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
The integrated automated approach delivered higher target doses within organ-at-risk limits, maintained robustness, and was qualitatively preferable in blinded comparison. It produced clinically acceptable dose distributions for 5/6 patients, versus 3/6 with the manual method, suggesting enhanced and potentially more efficient reirradiation planning.

Walton DP, Thompson C, Lowe D, Pagett CJH, Lilley J, Svensson S, Eriksson K, Bokrantz R, Ödén J, Murray L, Teo M, Appelt A

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Reirradiation is increasingly used for recurrent and new primary cancers, but dedicated planning tools are limited.

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Walton DP, Thompson C, et al. (2026). Treatment planning for lung cancer reirradiation accounting for previously delivered dose.. Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 38, 100912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2026.100912
MLA Walton DP, et al.. "Treatment planning for lung cancer reirradiation accounting for previously delivered dose.." Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, vol. 38, 2026, pp. 100912.
PMID 41853124 ↗

Abstract

Reirradiation is increasingly used for recurrent and new primary cancers, but dedicated planning tools are limited. We integrated deformable image registration and radiobiologically consistent dose accumulation into plan optimisation to improve plan quality and robustness, applying this approach to six lung cancer cases and comparing it with a manual, maximum point-dose method. The integrated automated approach delivered higher target doses within organ-at-risk limits, maintained robustness, and was qualitatively preferable in blinded comparison. It produced clinically acceptable dose distributions for 5/6 patients, versus 3/6 with the manual method, suggesting enhanced and potentially more efficient reirradiation planning.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기