본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Immunotherapy rechallenge after progression in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

iScience 2026 Vol.29(3) p. 114951

Li Y, Zhao J, Chen J, Zhou C, Yan Y, Chen W, Xu Y, Li Y

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

To determine whether immunotherapy can be continued in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after initial immunotherapy.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • HR 0.65

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Li Y, Zhao J, et al. (2026). Immunotherapy rechallenge after progression in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.. iScience, 29(3), 114951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.114951
MLA Li Y, et al.. "Immunotherapy rechallenge after progression in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.." iScience, vol. 29, no. 3, 2026, pp. 114951.
PMID 41797920

Abstract

To determine whether immunotherapy can be continued in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after initial immunotherapy. This study aimed to explore whether patients could benefit from immunotherapy after progression and identify the optimal treatment regimen. The included studies were classified into two groups based on whether patients continued immunotherapy rechallenge after disease progression: the immunotherapy rechallenge group and the non-immunotherapy group. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients in both groups were analyzed. Patients in the immunotherapy rechallenge group showed a significant advantage in PFS (HR: 0.65, = 0.004) and OS (HR: 0.69, = 0.013). In the analysis of different treatment regimens in the immunotherapy rechallenge group, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) + antiangiogenic therapy achieved the best PFS. These findings elucidate the role of ICI-based treatment strategies in patients with advanced NSCLC and are expected to supplement lung cancer immunotherapy guidelines.

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)