A practical framework for physicians and researchers to assess diagnostic bronchoscopy technologies in lung cancer.
2/5 보강
TL;DR
This review summarizes methodologic advances and provides a practical framework for clinicians to critically appraise diagnostic bronchoscopy studies, compare technologies, and apply results to individual patients with suspected lung cancer.
OpenAlex 토픽 ·
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Lung Cancer Research Studies
Tracheal and airway disorders
This review summarizes methodologic advances and provides a practical framework for clinicians to critically appraise diagnostic bronchoscopy studies, compare technologies, and apply results to indivi
APA
David E. Ost (2026). A practical framework for physicians and researchers to assess diagnostic bronchoscopy technologies in lung cancer.. Current opinion in pulmonary medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0000000000001271
MLA
David E. Ost. "A practical framework for physicians and researchers to assess diagnostic bronchoscopy technologies in lung cancer.." Current opinion in pulmonary medicine, 2026.
PMID
41873499 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[PURPOSE OF REVIEW] Advancements in bronchoscopic technologies have improved the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary nodules, yet inconsistent methodology and outcome definitions in observational studies hinder interpretation and comparison.
[RECENT FINDINGS] The American Thoracic Society (ATS) and American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) have published a Delphi consensus definition of diagnostic yield and reporting standards for diagnostic testing in respiratory medicine. Recognition that bronchoscopy is a multi-disease test has highlighted limitations of traditional dichotomous accuracy metrics.
[SUMMARY] This review summarizes these methodologic advances and provides a practical framework for clinicians to critically appraise diagnostic bronchoscopy studies, compare technologies, and apply results to individual patients with suspected lung cancer. Emphasis is placed on appropriate reference standards, recognition of bronchoscopy as a multi-disease test, and the superiority of disease specific sensitivity over diagnostic yield for cross-study comparisons.
[RECENT FINDINGS] The American Thoracic Society (ATS) and American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) have published a Delphi consensus definition of diagnostic yield and reporting standards for diagnostic testing in respiratory medicine. Recognition that bronchoscopy is a multi-disease test has highlighted limitations of traditional dichotomous accuracy metrics.
[SUMMARY] This review summarizes these methodologic advances and provides a practical framework for clinicians to critically appraise diagnostic bronchoscopy studies, compare technologies, and apply results to individual patients with suspected lung cancer. Emphasis is placed on appropriate reference standards, recognition of bronchoscopy as a multi-disease test, and the superiority of disease specific sensitivity over diagnostic yield for cross-study comparisons.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- Reforming the delivery of smoking cessation: a distributional cost-effectiveness analysis of providing smoking cessation as part of targeted lung cancer screening.
- A Phase II Study of Durvalumab, Doxorubicin, and Ifosfamide in Recurrent and/or Metastatic Pulmonary Sarcomatoid Carcinoma (KCSG LU-19-24).
- A herbal formulation inhibits growth and survival of lung cancer cells through DNA damage and apoptosis - in vitro and in vivo studies.
- Negative trial but positive lesson: reframing immunotherapy resistance from one-size-fits-all to precision strategies.
- Lung Cancer Screening in Adults: State-of-the-Art and Policy Mapping (2025).
- Retrospective dosimetric evaluation of the collapsed cone, AAA, and Acuros XB algorithms for lung cancer Halcyon VMAT plans.