본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Impact of First-Line Maintenance Immunotherapy With or Without Pemetrexed for Non-Squamous Advanced/Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Lacking Targetable Mutations: A Real-World Analysis in England.

2/5 보강
Clinical lung cancer 📖 저널 OA 15.7% 2025: 2/26 OA 2026: 16/89 OA 2025~2026 2026 Vol.27(3) p. 224-234.e8 Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
TL;DR Survival was numerically shorter for patients diagnosed during the COVID-19 pandemic (Cohort 2; interim guidance) versus Cohort 1 (pre-COVID-19).
Retraction 확인
출처
PubMed DOI OpenAlex Semantic 마지막 보강 2026-05-01

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
환자: non-squamous (NSQ) advanced/metastatic non-small cell cancer (a/mNSCLC), including the relative impact of 1LM pemetrexed, are lacking
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS] Survival was numerically shorter for patients diagnosed during the COVID-19 pandemic (Cohort 2; interim guidance) versus Cohort 1 (pre-COVID-19). In a combined cohort, survival was broadly similar regardless of 1LM pemetrexed use.
OpenAlex 토픽 · Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Gomes F, Gilding N, Tan V, Christoforou K, Rule J, Aziez A

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Survival was numerically shorter for patients diagnosed during the COVID-19 pandemic (Cohort 2; interim guidance) versus Cohort 1 (pre-COVID-19).

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Fabio M. Gomes, L. Niall Gilding, et al. (2026). Impact of First-Line Maintenance Immunotherapy With or Without Pemetrexed for Non-Squamous Advanced/Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Lacking Targetable Mutations: A Real-World Analysis in England.. Clinical lung cancer, 27(3), 224-234.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2025.12.007
MLA Fabio M. Gomes, et al.. "Impact of First-Line Maintenance Immunotherapy With or Without Pemetrexed for Non-Squamous Advanced/Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Lacking Targetable Mutations: A Real-World Analysis in England.." Clinical lung cancer, vol. 27, no. 3, 2026, pp. 224-234.e8.
PMID 41688331 ↗

Abstract

[OBJECTIVES] Real-world analyses of first-line maintenance (1LM) immuno-oncology (IO) treatment with or without pemetrexed for patients with non-squamous (NSQ) advanced/metastatic non-small cell cancer (a/mNSCLC), including the relative impact of 1LM pemetrexed, are lacking. This retrospective analysis describes 1LM treatment patterns and their outcomes in England.

[METHODS] Data from the National Disease Registration Service were collated to identify 2 cohorts of patients with NSQ a/mNSCLC completing ≥ 4 cycles of first-line (1L) platinum-based chemotherapy with IO plus pemetrexed, diagnosed from 1 March to 31 December 2019 (Cohort 1), or during a period where interim coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) guidelines were in effect (1 March to 31 December 2020; Cohort 2). Baseline characteristics, 1LM treatment, overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment or death in both cohorts, and in a combined cohort of patients receiving 1LM stratified by the presence/absence of 1LM pemetrexed, were analyzed.

[RESULTS] Overall, 595 and 516 NSQ a/mNSCLC patients were included in Cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. Median OS (95% confidence interval [CI], months) from start of 1L was numerically longer in Cohort 1 (19.5 [17.6-22.2] months) versus Cohort 2 (15.7 [14.2-18.0] months). Combined (Cohort 1 and Cohort 2) median OS from 1L was broadly similar irrespective of pemetrexed presence (19.5 [17.5-21.6] months) or absence (18.6 [15.6-23.0] months) in 1LM.

[CONCLUSIONS] Survival was numerically shorter for patients diagnosed during the COVID-19 pandemic (Cohort 2; interim guidance) versus Cohort 1 (pre-COVID-19). In a combined cohort, survival was broadly similar regardless of 1LM pemetrexed use.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

… 외 1개

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반