본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Modern Treatment Era.

Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery 2026 Vol.41(4)

Kanzaki R, Chikaraishi H, Tokunaga T, Samejima H, Kobayashi M, Maniwa T, Fujii T, Okami J

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[OBJECTIVES] Pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) has been a viable treatment option for metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value P = .005

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Kanzaki R, Chikaraishi H, et al. (2026). Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Modern Treatment Era.. Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 41(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivag090
MLA Kanzaki R, et al.. "Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Modern Treatment Era.." Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, vol. 41, no. 4, 2026.
PMID 41886312

Abstract

[OBJECTIVES] Pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) has been a viable treatment option for metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). In recent years, advances in systemic therapy and multidisciplinary cancer management, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have changed the treatment landscape of advanced or recurrent head and neck cancer.

[METHODS] We retrospectively reviewed 44 patients who underwent complete resection for pulmonary metastases from HNSCC between 2008 and 2021. To minimize the risk of including primary lung cancer, 8 patients were excluded based on predefined clinical criteria, resulting in a final cohort of 36 patients for analysis. Patients were divided into the early (2008-2016) and late (2017-2021) period groups. Relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and prognostic factors were assessed.

[RESULTS] The 5-year RFS and OS for all patients were 41% and 67%, respectively. Postoperative chemotherapy was associated with better RFS, and age ≤65 years with better OS. ICIs were administered to 1 patient in the early period group and 7 in the late period group during the clinical course (P = .005). The 5-year RFS and OS were 42% vs 40% and 55% vs 87% in the early and late period groups, respectively. While RFS was comparable, OS tended to be better in the late period group, although the difference was not statistically significant.

[CONCLUSIONS] PM is associated with favourable long-term outcomes in patients with HNSCC. Given its potential for long-term survival and diagnostic value, PM remains an important treatment option for HNSCC in the modern treatment era.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Male; Female; Retrospective Studies; Middle Aged; Metastasectomy; Lung Neoplasms; Aged; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Pneumonectomy; Adult; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Risk Factors

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (2)