본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Evaluation of postoperative pain by PainVision® PS-2100, a quantitative analyzer for perception and pain in pulmonary resection: a prospective pilot study.

1/5 보강
Journal of anesthesia 2026
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
추출되지 않음
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
lobectomy or segmentectomy for lung tumors were enrolled
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
PD and NRS scores showed similar trends: values on POD 2 were comparable to POD 1, whereas PODs 5 and 7 were significantly lower. [CONCLUSION] PainVision® may be a feasible tool for quantifying acute postoperative pain following lung resection.

Masuda T, Kojima H, Mizuno T, Notsu A, Matsushima K, Takei K, Hori S, Morizono S, Maeda K, Nagata T, Katsumata S, Konno H, Yokomakura N, Isaka M, Wakuda K, Takahashi T, Ohde Y

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[PURPOSE] Pain intensity is typically assessed using qualitative scales, including the numerical rating scale (NRS), which has limitations in quantifying pain intensity.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 736
  • p-value p < 0.05
  • p-value p < 0.001

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Masuda T, Kojima H, et al. (2026). Evaluation of postoperative pain by PainVision® PS-2100, a quantitative analyzer for perception and pain in pulmonary resection: a prospective pilot study.. Journal of anesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-026-03727-7
MLA Masuda T, et al.. "Evaluation of postoperative pain by PainVision® PS-2100, a quantitative analyzer for perception and pain in pulmonary resection: a prospective pilot study.." Journal of anesthesia, 2026.
PMID 41920312 ↗

Abstract

[PURPOSE] Pain intensity is typically assessed using qualitative scales, including the numerical rating scale (NRS), which has limitations in quantifying pain intensity. PainVision® PS-2100 (Nipro Corporation, Osaka, Japan) was developed to quantify pain as pain degree (PD); however, its ability to assess acute postoperative pain remains unclear. This prospective single-center pilot study aimed to evaluate the performance of PainVision® by comparing PD with NRS scores after lung resection surgery.

[METHODS] Fifty patients who underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy for lung tumors were enrolled. PD and NRS scores were measured twice daily, at rest and during mobilization, on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 2, 5, and 7. The correlation coefficient between PD and NRS scores on POD 1 was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included the correlation coefficients on PODs 2, 5, and 7; the overall correlation coefficient across all measured data; and a comparison of postoperative trends in PD and NRS scores.

[RESULTS] On POD 1, statistically significant weak-to-moderate positive correlations were observed between PD and NRS scores (r = 0.363-0.634, p < 0.05). Similar results were observed on PODs 2, 5, and 7 in most measurement conditions (r = 0.274-0.664). A statistically significant moderate correlation was observed across all measurements (n = 736; r = 0.575, p < 0.001). PD and NRS scores showed similar trends: values on POD 2 were comparable to POD 1, whereas PODs 5 and 7 were significantly lower.

[CONCLUSION] PainVision® may be a feasible tool for quantifying acute postoperative pain following lung resection.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반