본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Prognostic analysis and development of a prognostic model for EML4-ALK-positive lung cancer patients treated with ALK-TKIs.

Frontiers in medicine 2026 Vol.13() p. 1760300

Liu R, Su C, Su H, Wang L

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[OBJECTIVE] This study aimed to investigate prognostic factors and establish prognostic models for EML4-ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 95% CI 25.43-36.52
  • HR 2.15

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Liu R, Su C, et al. (2026). Prognostic analysis and development of a prognostic model for EML4-ALK-positive lung cancer patients treated with ALK-TKIs.. Frontiers in medicine, 13, 1760300. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1760300
MLA Liu R, et al.. "Prognostic analysis and development of a prognostic model for EML4-ALK-positive lung cancer patients treated with ALK-TKIs.." Frontiers in medicine, vol. 13, 2026, pp. 1760300.
PMID 42023107

Abstract

[OBJECTIVE] This study aimed to investigate prognostic factors and establish prognostic models for EML4-ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) treatment.

[METHODS] We retrospectively analyzed 114 ALK-positive NSCLC patients treated at our institution from January 2020 to January 2024. Clinical data, laboratory results, imaging findings, and follow-up records were collected. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) served as primary endpoints. Statistical methods included Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox regression modeling, and nomogram construction (70% training set, 30% validation cohort). Model performance was evaluated using Harrell's C-index, calibration curves, and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

[RESULTS] The median PFS was 30.97 months (95% CI: 25.43-36.52), while median OS was not reached. Multivariate analysis identified four independent PFS predictors: brain metastasis (HR = 2.15,  = 0.008), central lesion location (HR = 1.89,  = 0.013), tumor diameter >3 cm (HR = 1.76,  = 0.022), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio ≤2.26 (HR = 1.92,  = 0.011). For OS, significant factors included brain metastasis (HR = 2.87,  = 0.002), CYFRA21-1 level (HR = 1.65,  = 0.028), and LMR (HR = 2.04,  = 0.007). The developed nomograms demonstrated good prognostic accuracy, with validation cohort C-indices of 0.73 (PFS) and 0.75 (OS). Time-dependent AUCs for 3-year PFS and 4-year OS prognostic were 0.79 and 0.78, respectively.

[CONCLUSION] Our study established that brain metastasis status, tumor characteristics, and systemic inflammatory markers significantly impact clinical outcomes in ALK-positive NSCLC patients undergoing TKI therapy. The developed prognostic models show satisfactory prognostic performance and may assist in clinical decision-making and patient stratification. These findings warrant further validation in prospective, multicenter studies.

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)