본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Effect of Interval Between Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy and Radical Resection of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study.

코호트 2/5 보강
International journal of cancer 📖 저널 OA 48.5% 2026 Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Retraction 확인
출처
PubMed DOI OpenAlex 마지막 보강 2026-04-30

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
환자: a poor tumor regression response, LIG was significantly associated with poorer DFS (HR, 5
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Surgery performed within 4-6 weeks after the completion of NICT is associated with improved pCR and DFS. Emphasis should be placed on early surgical treatment after NICT, particularly in patients who have poor or no response to NICT.
OpenAlex 토픽 · Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers Lung Cancer Research Studies

Wang J, Song P, Ge Y, Yang H, Li S, Ma R, Ma T, Feng S, Zhang C, Sun T, Yao F, Yi J, Zhang H

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Radical surgery following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) has emerged as a critical therapeutic strategy in the standardized management of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p < 0.001
  • p-value p = 0.019
  • 95% CI 0.06-0.38

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Jiayi Wang, Ping Song, et al. (2026). Effect of Interval Between Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy and Radical Resection of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study.. International journal of cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70473
MLA Jiayi Wang, et al.. "Effect of Interval Between Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy and Radical Resection of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study.." International journal of cancer, 2026.
PMID 41957998
DOI 10.1002/ijc.70473

Abstract

Radical surgery following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) has emerged as a critical therapeutic strategy in the standardized management of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Robust evidence on the optimal time interval between NICT and surgery is lacking. Patients were divided into three groups based on the interval between the completion of NICT and surgery: short interval group (SIG; < 4 weeks), intermediate interval group (IIG; 4-6 weeks), and long interval group (LIG; > 6 weeks). Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) and weighted regression analysis were used to balance the baseline characteristics and compare the outcomes. 205 out of 335 screened patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled. When compared with the IIG, the SIG (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.06-0.38; p < 0.001) was significantly correlated with lower pCR rate and the DFS was worse in the LIG (HR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.15-4.80; p = 0.019). Subgroup analysis revealed that, in patients with a poor tumor regression response, LIG was significantly associated with poorer DFS (HR, 5.15; 95% CI, 2.27-11.71; p < 0.001) and OS (HR, 4.52; 95% CI, 1.48-13.79; p = 0.008) when compared with the IIG. Similarly, in patients with non-pCR, LIG was significantly associated with poorer DFS (HR, 3.25; 95% CI, 1.39-7.61; p = 0.006) and OS (HR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.00-7.38; p = 0.049). Surgery performed within 4-6 weeks after the completion of NICT is associated with improved pCR and DFS. Emphasis should be placed on early surgical treatment after NICT, particularly in patients who have poor or no response to NICT.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)