본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

CALGB 140503 and the shift to sublobar resection for small, peripheral, node-negative NSCLC: historical context, secondary analyses, and next steps.

Frontiers in oncology 2026 Vol.16() p. 1791539

Chow OS, Jones DR, Stinchcombe TE, Altorki NK

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

The surgical management of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been reshaped by contemporary randomized data supporting lung-sparing approaches in carefully selected patients.

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Chow OS, Jones DR, et al. (2026). CALGB 140503 and the shift to sublobar resection for small, peripheral, node-negative NSCLC: historical context, secondary analyses, and next steps.. Frontiers in oncology, 16, 1791539. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1791539
MLA Chow OS, et al.. "CALGB 140503 and the shift to sublobar resection for small, peripheral, node-negative NSCLC: historical context, secondary analyses, and next steps.." Frontiers in oncology, vol. 16, 2026, pp. 1791539.
PMID 42038383

Abstract

The surgical management of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been reshaped by contemporary randomized data supporting lung-sparing approaches in carefully selected patients. CALGB/Alliance 140503, a multicenter phase III trial, compared sublobar resection (wedge or segmentectomy) with lobectomy for peripheral, clinically node-negative NSCLC ≤2 cm, randomizing patients only after rigorous intraoperative nodal assessment. Sublobar resection proved noninferior to lobectomy with respect to disease-free survival, with comparable overall survival and recurrence patterns. Alongside other important randomized trials like JCOG 0802/WJOG 4607L, sublobar resection has now been established as an acceptable - and for some patients preferable - strategy for stage IA (≤ 2 cm) NSCLC. Beyond its primary results, CALGB 140503 has generated a series of secondary and exploratory analyses that continue to refine day-to-day clinical decision-making. This mini-review aims to synthesize the current state of insights from this trial, highlighting ongoing controversies and key gaps for future investigation that will further optimize the management of early-stage NSCLC.