Node-RADS v1.0 on chest CT for lung cancer: Reproducibility and diagnostic performance.
2/5 보강
OpenAlex 토픽 ·
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
[PURPOSE] To evaluate intra- and inter-reader agreement of Node-RADS v1.0 for mediastinal lymph node assessment on chest CT in patients with stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to asses
- 95% CI 0.96-0.99
APA
Lorenzo Cereser, Tin Nadarević, et al. (2026). Node-RADS v1.0 on chest CT for lung cancer: Reproducibility and diagnostic performance.. European journal of radiology, 200, 112868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2026.112868
MLA
Lorenzo Cereser, et al.. "Node-RADS v1.0 on chest CT for lung cancer: Reproducibility and diagnostic performance.." European journal of radiology, vol. 200, 2026, pp. 112868.
PMID
42000469 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[PURPOSE] To evaluate intra- and inter-reader agreement of Node-RADS v1.0 for mediastinal lymph node assessment on chest CT in patients with stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to assess its diagnostic performance across radiologists with different levels of expertise.
[METHODS] This retrospective, single-center study included 46 patients (mean age, 71 ± 8 years; 38 adenocarcinomas, 8 squamous cell carcinomas) with 158 pathologically confirmed mediastinal lymph nodes (22 malignant, 136 benign). Four radiologists (two experts, two juniors) independently assigned Node-RADS scores and descriptors ("size" and "configuration") in two sessions, three weeks apart. Agreement was calculated using Gwet's AC2 statistics. Diagnostic performance was assessed by ROC analysis; sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated at a Node-RADS score ≥ 3 threshold.
[RESULTS] Inter-reader agreement for Node-RADS scores was almost perfect for experts (AC2 = 0.97; 95%CI: 0.96-0.99) and juniors (AC2 = 0.95; 95%CI: 0.93-0.97). Intra-reader agreement AC2 values ranged from 0.95 to 0.99. Descriptor agreement was similarly high (AC2 ≥ 0.85). ROC AUCs ranged from 0.71 to 0.76 for experts and 0.68-0.84 for juniors. At the ≥ 3 threshold, specificity and negative predictive value were consistently ≥ 90%, while sensitivity remained limited (<64%).
[CONCLUSIONS] Node-RADS v1.0 demonstrated excellent reproducibility among radiologists with different levels of expertise for mediastinal lymph node assessment on chest CT in NSCLC. The consistently high specificity and negative predictive value support its role as a standardized framework for structured lymph node reporting and training, while the limited sensitivity underscores the need for complementary diagnostic tools.
[METHODS] This retrospective, single-center study included 46 patients (mean age, 71 ± 8 years; 38 adenocarcinomas, 8 squamous cell carcinomas) with 158 pathologically confirmed mediastinal lymph nodes (22 malignant, 136 benign). Four radiologists (two experts, two juniors) independently assigned Node-RADS scores and descriptors ("size" and "configuration") in two sessions, three weeks apart. Agreement was calculated using Gwet's AC2 statistics. Diagnostic performance was assessed by ROC analysis; sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated at a Node-RADS score ≥ 3 threshold.
[RESULTS] Inter-reader agreement for Node-RADS scores was almost perfect for experts (AC2 = 0.97; 95%CI: 0.96-0.99) and juniors (AC2 = 0.95; 95%CI: 0.93-0.97). Intra-reader agreement AC2 values ranged from 0.95 to 0.99. Descriptor agreement was similarly high (AC2 ≥ 0.85). ROC AUCs ranged from 0.71 to 0.76 for experts and 0.68-0.84 for juniors. At the ≥ 3 threshold, specificity and negative predictive value were consistently ≥ 90%, while sensitivity remained limited (<64%).
[CONCLUSIONS] Node-RADS v1.0 demonstrated excellent reproducibility among radiologists with different levels of expertise for mediastinal lymph node assessment on chest CT in NSCLC. The consistently high specificity and negative predictive value support its role as a standardized framework for structured lymph node reporting and training, while the limited sensitivity underscores the need for complementary diagnostic tools.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Lung Cancer Screening in Adults: State-of-the-Art and Policy Mapping (2025).
- Treating a single tumor deposits as two lymph node metastases can improve the accuracy of gastric cancer prognosis assessment.
- Novel silicon-based material decomposition images in diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: comparison with iodine-based and 50-keV virtual monoenergetic images.
- A novel real-world data methodology for lymphoma outcome classification: the real-world Lugano study.
- Independent Predictors Associated with Patient Refusal of Invasive Diagnostic Procedures After Positive LDCT Lung Cancer Screening.