본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Node-RADS v1.0 on chest CT for lung cancer: Reproducibility and diagnostic performance.

2/5 보강
European journal of radiology 📖 저널 OA 12.8% 2022: 0/1 OA 2023: 0/2 OA 2024: 0/4 OA 2025: 1/40 OA 2026: 14/67 OA 2022~2026 2026 Vol.200() p. 112868 OA Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Retraction 확인
출처
PubMed DOI OpenAlex 마지막 보강 2026-04-30
OpenAlex 토픽 · Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations

Cereser L, Nadarević T, Ciancimino C, Versienti E, Pace AP, Como G

📖 무료 전문 🔓 OA PDF oa
📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[PURPOSE] To evaluate intra- and inter-reader agreement of Node-RADS v1.0 for mediastinal lymph node assessment on chest CT in patients with stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to asses

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 95% CI 0.96-0.99

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Lorenzo Cereser, Tin Nadarević, et al. (2026). Node-RADS v1.0 on chest CT for lung cancer: Reproducibility and diagnostic performance.. European journal of radiology, 200, 112868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2026.112868
MLA Lorenzo Cereser, et al.. "Node-RADS v1.0 on chest CT for lung cancer: Reproducibility and diagnostic performance.." European journal of radiology, vol. 200, 2026, pp. 112868.
PMID 42000469 ↗

Abstract

[PURPOSE] To evaluate intra- and inter-reader agreement of Node-RADS v1.0 for mediastinal lymph node assessment on chest CT in patients with stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to assess its diagnostic performance across radiologists with different levels of expertise.

[METHODS] This retrospective, single-center study included 46 patients (mean age, 71 ± 8 years; 38 adenocarcinomas, 8 squamous cell carcinomas) with 158 pathologically confirmed mediastinal lymph nodes (22 malignant, 136 benign). Four radiologists (two experts, two juniors) independently assigned Node-RADS scores and descriptors ("size" and "configuration") in two sessions, three weeks apart. Agreement was calculated using Gwet's AC2 statistics. Diagnostic performance was assessed by ROC analysis; sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated at a Node-RADS score ≥ 3 threshold.

[RESULTS] Inter-reader agreement for Node-RADS scores was almost perfect for experts (AC2 = 0.97; 95%CI: 0.96-0.99) and juniors (AC2 = 0.95; 95%CI: 0.93-0.97). Intra-reader agreement AC2 values ranged from 0.95 to 0.99. Descriptor agreement was similarly high (AC2 ≥ 0.85). ROC AUCs ranged from 0.71 to 0.76 for experts and 0.68-0.84 for juniors. At the ≥ 3 threshold, specificity and negative predictive value were consistently ≥ 90%, while sensitivity remained limited (<64%).

[CONCLUSIONS] Node-RADS v1.0 demonstrated excellent reproducibility among radiologists with different levels of expertise for mediastinal lymph node assessment on chest CT in NSCLC. The consistently high specificity and negative predictive value support its role as a standardized framework for structured lymph node reporting and training, while the limited sensitivity underscores the need for complementary diagnostic tools.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🔓 OA PDF 열기