본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening in France with low-dose computed tomography.

European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) 2026 Vol.35(3) p. 273-280 🌐 cited 1 🔓 OA Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
TL;DR Assessing the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening in the French context including LDCT and biomarkers found biennial LDCT screening could be an effective and cost-effective strategy in France even at a 25% participation rate.
OpenAlex 토픽 · Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment Global Cancer Incidence and Screening

Leleu H, Berkovitch Q, Bonastre J, Caramella C, Giroux-Leprieur É, Lefèvre L, Lavaud P, Todea A, Wislez M, Hofman P

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Assessing the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening in the French context including LDCT and biomarkers found biennial LDCT screening could be an effective and cost-effective strate

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Henri Leleu, Quentin Berkovitch, et al. (2026). Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening in France with low-dose computed tomography.. European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP), 35(3), 273-280. https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000973
MLA Henri Leleu, et al.. "Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening in France with low-dose computed tomography.." European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP), vol. 35, no. 3, 2026, pp. 273-280.
PMID 40392283

Abstract

Lung cancer is the third most frequent cancer in France. It has a poor prognosis when patients are diagnosed at advanced stages. Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) can detect early-stage cancer. In addition, blood-based biomarkers could help select patients for lung cancer screening or manage indeterminate lung nodules. The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening in the French context including LDCT and biomarkers. A microsimulation model calibrated for France was used to compare four strategies: no screening, biennial LDCT, biennial LDCT followed by biomarkers, and biennial screening with biomarkers followed by LDCT. Screening eligibility included age (50-74) and smoking history (>15 cigarettes/day over 25 years, or 10 cigarettes/day over 30 years, or former smokers who quit less than 10 years ago). A 25% participation rate was assumed. Direct medical costs were estimated from the perspective of the French health system. Cost and outcomes were discounted at 2.5%. Screening decreased lifetime lung cancer mortality from 2 to 12% depending on the participation rate, leading to an increase in both life years and quality-adjusted life years (QALY). Considering cost effectiveness, LDCT screening was associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €7629 per QALY in comparison to the absence of screening. Sensitivity analyses were all favorable to LDCT-based screening strategies. Biennial LDCT screening could be an effective and cost-effective strategy in France even at a 25% participation rate.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Cost-Benefit Analysis; France; Early Detection of Cancer; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Middle Aged; Female; Male; Aged; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Radiation Dosage