본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Pericardiocentesis complicated by catheter migration into the pulmonary artery: A case report.

증례보고 2/5 보강
Radiology case reports 2026 Vol.21(5) p. 2190-2193 OA Pericarditis and Cardiac Tamponade
TL;DR This case illustrates that in patients with malignant pericardial disease, particularly those with prior pericardial interventions, pericardiocentesis may carry a high risk of catastrophic complications.
Retraction 확인
출처
PubMed DOI PMC OpenAlex Semantic 마지막 보강 2026-04-29

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
환자: malignant pericardial disease, particularly those with prior pericardial interventions, pericardiocentesis may carry a high risk of catastrophic complications
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
This case illustrates that in patients with malignant pericardial disease, particularly those with prior pericardial interventions, pericardiocentesis may carry a high risk of catastrophic complications. Careful confirmation of catheter position and early consideration of surgical drainage are critical to improving patient safety in high-risk settings.
OpenAlex 토픽 · Pericarditis and Cardiac Tamponade Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions

Aydın MZ, Teber MK, Kılıç KK, Kural Ö, Abdi IA

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

This case illustrates that in patients with malignant pericardial disease, particularly those with prior pericardial interventions, pericardiocentesis may carry a high risk of catastrophic complicatio

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Mehmet Zafer Aydın, Mehmet Kamil Teber, et al. (2026). Pericardiocentesis complicated by catheter migration into the pulmonary artery: A case report.. Radiology case reports, 21(5), 2190-2193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2026.01.102
MLA Mehmet Zafer Aydın, et al.. "Pericardiocentesis complicated by catheter migration into the pulmonary artery: A case report.." Radiology case reports, vol. 21, no. 5, 2026, pp. 2190-2193.
PMID 41798671

Abstract

Pericardiocentesis is widely used for the management of malignant pericardial effusion and is generally considered a safe procedure; however, when complications occur, they may be sudden and fatal. We describe a 72-year-old woman with metastatic squamous cell lung carcinoma who presented with chest pain, progressive dyspnea, and palpitations. Electrocardiography revealed atrial fibrillation with low-voltage QRS complexes, and transthoracic echocardiography demonstrated a large circumferential pericardial effusion. As the patient developed worsening hypotension and clinical features of evolving cardiac tamponade, apical pericardiocentesis was performed, draining 350 mL of hemorrhagic, non-clotted fluid. Shortly after the procedure, imaging revealed malposition of the drainage catheter, initially within the right ventricle, with subsequent migration into the pulmonary artery. Urgent surgical exploration confirmed right ventricular perforation by the catheter in the presence of dense pericardial adhesions. Despite attempted catheter removal and creation of a pericardial window, the patient died intraoperatively from uncontrollable bleeding. This case illustrates that in patients with malignant pericardial disease, particularly those with prior pericardial interventions, pericardiocentesis may carry a high risk of catastrophic complications. Careful confirmation of catheter position and early consideration of surgical drainage are critical to improving patient safety in high-risk settings.