본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Emerging therapies for glioblastoma.

1/5 보강
Journal of neuro-oncology 📖 저널 OA 41.1% 2021: 0/1 OA 2022: 0/3 OA 2023: 1/4 OA 2024: 1/1 OA 2025: 17/31 OA 2026: 11/29 OA 2021~2026 2025 Vol.176(1) p. 116
Retraction 확인
출처

Sarfraz Z, Ranjan T, Mustafayev FNA, Jaramillo M, Odia Y, Venur VA, Ahluwalia MS

ℹ️ 이 논문은 무료 전문이 아직 없습니다. 코퍼스 전체의 43.7%는 무료 가능 (통계 →) · 🏥 기관 EZproxy로 시도

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Glioblastoma (GBM) remains associated with poor outcomes, with a median survival of 15-18 months despite maximal safe resection, radiotherapy, and temozolomide.

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Sarfraz Z, Ranjan T, et al. (2025). Emerging therapies for glioblastoma.. Journal of neuro-oncology, 176(1), 116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-025-05248-x
MLA Sarfraz Z, et al.. "Emerging therapies for glioblastoma.." Journal of neuro-oncology, vol. 176, no. 1, 2025, pp. 116.
PMID 41372729 ↗

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) remains associated with poor outcomes, with a median survival of 15-18 months despite maximal safe resection, radiotherapy, and temozolomide. Therapeutic development has increasingly centered on overcoming drug resistance, intratumoral diversity, and restricted delivery across the blood-brain barrier. Progress in targeted therapy includes evaluation of EGFR inhibitors, multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and FGFR-directed agents, while rare molecularly defined subsets such as BRAF V600E and NTRK fusions offer tumor-agnostic precision approaches. JAK/STAT inhibition, PARP blockade, and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway modulation remain under investigation, although clinical benefit has been inconsistent. In parallel, precision oncology platforms incorporating multi-omic profiling, patient-derived organoids, and functional drug testing are refining therapy selection and supporting rational drug combinations. Adaptive clinical trial frameworks such as GBM AGILE and INSIGhT are accelerating the evaluation of novel agents within stratified cohorts,while emerging approaches including ChemoID-guided therapy, radiogenomic profiling, and digital modeling are beginning to influence translational endpoints. Immunotherapy continues to be an active area of research, though efficacy has thus far been limited. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have not yet demonstrated significant survival benefits as monotherapy, but combination strategies with vaccines, oncolytic viruses, and engineered cellular therapies are under evaluation. CAR T-cell therapies are advancing toward bispecific and armored constructs with locoregional delivery, while oncolytic viruses such as DNX-2401 and PVSRIPO demonstrate potential for durable responses in select patients. Looking ahead, progress is likely to arise from biomarker-informed, multimodal regimens that integrate targeted agents, next-generation immunotherapies, and precision-guided strategies, while embedding translational endpoints into trial design to address the complex biology and therapeutic resistance of GBM.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (2)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반