Incorporating sentinel chain involvement pattern to predict non-sentinel lymph nodes status in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
316 patients analyzed, 98.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
The model showed adequate discrimination, with AUC of 0.942 and 0.930 in training and validation cohort, respectively. [CONCLUSION] The model demonstrated satisfactory performance in predicting non-SLN metastasis in BC patients with positive SLNs after NAC and had potential to select patients with low risk of non-SLNs metastasis who could avoid ALND.
[PURPOSE] Up to 60% of breast cancer (BC) patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) had no metastatic non-sentinel lymph node (non-SLN).
- p-value p < 0.001
- 95% CI 5.14-48.80
- OR 15.83
APA
Liang M, Zhu T, et al. (2026). Incorporating sentinel chain involvement pattern to predict non-sentinel lymph nodes status in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.. Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 28(1), 203-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-025-03993-z
MLA
Liang M, et al.. "Incorporating sentinel chain involvement pattern to predict non-sentinel lymph nodes status in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.." Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, vol. 28, no. 1, 2026, pp. 203-214.
PMID
40745244
Abstract
[PURPOSE] Up to 60% of breast cancer (BC) patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) had no metastatic non-sentinel lymph node (non-SLN). We aimed to establish a model incorporating sentinel chain involvement pattern to predict the non-SLN status.
[METHODS] SLNs were ranked in the order of fluorescent intensity, black staining degree, and lymphatic drainage to form a sentinel chain, which included three involvement patterns: sequential pattern (metastases are found in SLNs ranking ahead), skip pattern (metastases do not relate to the order of SLNs), and all involved pattern. The relationship between sentinel chain involvement pattern and non-SLN metastasis was explored.
[RESULTS] Of the 316 patients analyzed, 98.6% (71/72) of patients with all involved pattern, 58.9% (66/112) with skip pattern, and 13.6% (18/132) with sequential pattern had non-SLN metastases. The non-SLN metastasis rate in sequential pattern was significantly lower than that in the other two patterns (OR = 15.83, 95% CI: 5.14-48.80, p < 0.001; OR = 2.273, 95% CI: 0.15-35.56, p = 0.559). Multivariate logistic regression indicated that factors including sentinel chain involvement pattern, number of positive and negative SLNs, and primary tumor size were independent predictors of non-SLN. The model showed adequate discrimination, with AUC of 0.942 and 0.930 in training and validation cohort, respectively.
[CONCLUSION] The model demonstrated satisfactory performance in predicting non-SLN metastasis in BC patients with positive SLNs after NAC and had potential to select patients with low risk of non-SLNs metastasis who could avoid ALND.
[METHODS] SLNs were ranked in the order of fluorescent intensity, black staining degree, and lymphatic drainage to form a sentinel chain, which included three involvement patterns: sequential pattern (metastases are found in SLNs ranking ahead), skip pattern (metastases do not relate to the order of SLNs), and all involved pattern. The relationship between sentinel chain involvement pattern and non-SLN metastasis was explored.
[RESULTS] Of the 316 patients analyzed, 98.6% (71/72) of patients with all involved pattern, 58.9% (66/112) with skip pattern, and 13.6% (18/132) with sequential pattern had non-SLN metastases. The non-SLN metastasis rate in sequential pattern was significantly lower than that in the other two patterns (OR = 15.83, 95% CI: 5.14-48.80, p < 0.001; OR = 2.273, 95% CI: 0.15-35.56, p = 0.559). Multivariate logistic regression indicated that factors including sentinel chain involvement pattern, number of positive and negative SLNs, and primary tumor size were independent predictors of non-SLN. The model showed adequate discrimination, with AUC of 0.942 and 0.930 in training and validation cohort, respectively.
[CONCLUSION] The model demonstrated satisfactory performance in predicting non-SLN metastasis in BC patients with positive SLNs after NAC and had potential to select patients with low risk of non-SLNs metastasis who could avoid ALND.
MeSH Terms
Humans; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Middle Aged; Sentinel Lymph Node; Lymphatic Metastasis; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy; Adult; Aged; Retrospective Studies; Lymph Nodes; Prognosis; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)
- [F]FDG PET/CT reveals HPA axis hyperactivity in lung cancer: prognostic value and therapeutic potential.
- The association between psychological status and the development of early gastric cancer from atrophic gastritis.
- Quality and reliability of prostate cancer-Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-sectional content analysis study.
- Laparoscopic vs open gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: comparative short- and long-term outcomes.
- Changes in intestinal microbiota in patients with pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.