Prediction of neoadjuvant therapy response in breast cancer based on interpretable artificial intelligence.
[BACKGROUND] To develop an AI-based predictive model for neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) efficacy in breast cancer, we integrated multimodal data and analyzed tumor microenvironment (TME) features to provid
APA
Zhou Y, Shu X, et al. (2026). Prediction of neoadjuvant therapy response in breast cancer based on interpretable artificial intelligence.. International journal of surgery (London, England), 112(1), 1066-1080. https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000003326
MLA
Zhou Y, et al.. "Prediction of neoadjuvant therapy response in breast cancer based on interpretable artificial intelligence.." International journal of surgery (London, England), vol. 112, no. 1, 2026, pp. 1066-1080.
PMID
40990507
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] To develop an AI-based predictive model for neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) efficacy in breast cancer, we integrated multimodal data and analyzed tumor microenvironment (TME) features to provide interpretability.
[METHODS] We retrospectively analyzed H&E-stained whole-slide images (WSIs) from a multicenter cohort of breast cancer patients receiving NAT to develop an AI predictive model. The cohort was stratified into training, test, internal validation, and external validation sets. Feature extraction used UNI and classification employed a multiple instance learning (MIL) framework. Model performance was evaluated via ROC curve analysis (AUC, precision, specificity, recall). Molecular mechanisms underlying model predictions were explored using TCGA multimodal data, integrating differential gene expression profiling with pathway enrichment analysis (GO, KEGG). TME component correlations with model scores were also investigated.
[RESULTS] The AI model demonstrated robust discriminative capacity across three residual cancer burden (RCB)-based classification tasks in 826 patients from two centers, achieving peak performance in subtask 2 (NAT-sensitive: RCB 0-1 vs. NAT-resistant: RCB 2-3). For subtask 2, AUCs were 0.901 (training), 0.858 (test), 0.808 (internal validation), and 0.819 (external validation). Molecular analysis linked the model's predictive efficacy to tumor cell cycle processes. TME analysis revealed positive correlations between model scores and activated immune cells (M0/M1 macrophages, dendritic cells), and negative correlations with inhibitory cells (M2 macrophages, resting mast cells). Crucially, the model's predictive scores were closely related to tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), with spatial colocalization observed between classification weights and TILs distribution. Significant differences in TILs levels occurred across model score strata, validating the model's biological plausibility in predicting NAT response mechanisms.
[CONCLUSION] We developed an interpretable AI model that predicts response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer using H&E slides. The model's predictions are biologically interpretable, correlating with TME dynamics and spatial TIL patterns, offering a novel strategy for personalizing NAT treatment strategies.
[METHODS] We retrospectively analyzed H&E-stained whole-slide images (WSIs) from a multicenter cohort of breast cancer patients receiving NAT to develop an AI predictive model. The cohort was stratified into training, test, internal validation, and external validation sets. Feature extraction used UNI and classification employed a multiple instance learning (MIL) framework. Model performance was evaluated via ROC curve analysis (AUC, precision, specificity, recall). Molecular mechanisms underlying model predictions were explored using TCGA multimodal data, integrating differential gene expression profiling with pathway enrichment analysis (GO, KEGG). TME component correlations with model scores were also investigated.
[RESULTS] The AI model demonstrated robust discriminative capacity across three residual cancer burden (RCB)-based classification tasks in 826 patients from two centers, achieving peak performance in subtask 2 (NAT-sensitive: RCB 0-1 vs. NAT-resistant: RCB 2-3). For subtask 2, AUCs were 0.901 (training), 0.858 (test), 0.808 (internal validation), and 0.819 (external validation). Molecular analysis linked the model's predictive efficacy to tumor cell cycle processes. TME analysis revealed positive correlations between model scores and activated immune cells (M0/M1 macrophages, dendritic cells), and negative correlations with inhibitory cells (M2 macrophages, resting mast cells). Crucially, the model's predictive scores were closely related to tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), with spatial colocalization observed between classification weights and TILs distribution. Significant differences in TILs levels occurred across model score strata, validating the model's biological plausibility in predicting NAT response mechanisms.
[CONCLUSION] We developed an interpretable AI model that predicts response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer using H&E slides. The model's predictions are biologically interpretable, correlating with TME dynamics and spatial TIL patterns, offering a novel strategy for personalizing NAT treatment strategies.
MeSH Terms
Humans; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Artificial Intelligence; Retrospective Studies; Tumor Microenvironment; Middle Aged
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)
- Characterization and Risk Factors of Folliculitis after Hair Transplantation: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.
- Botulinum Toxins for the Treatment of Raynaud Phenomenon: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis.
- Reversing Cuproptosis Tolerance with Twinborn Metallic Polymer Nanoparticles for Enhancing Efficacy of Chemo-Immunotherapy.
- Chalcone-containing dual-targeting PD-L1/tubulin small molecules: a novel approach for cancer immunotherapy.
- Correction: Piperlongumine Inhibits Lung Cancer Growth by Inducing Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Leading To Suppression of M2 Macrophage Polarization.