본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

"Whose perfection is it anyway?": a virtuous consideration of enhancement.

Christian bioethics 1999 Vol.5(2) p. 104-20

Keenan JF

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

【연구 목적】 유전자 향상 기술에 대한 논의에서 흔히 나타나는 인간이 미래의 perfection(완벽함)을 추구하려는 욕망에 대한 깊은 불신과 오만함의 전제를 비판적으로 검토한다.

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Keenan JF (1999). "Whose perfection is it anyway?": a virtuous consideration of enhancement.. Christian bioethics, 5(2), 104-20. https://doi.org/10.1076/chbi.5.2.104.3785
MLA Keenan JF. ""Whose perfection is it anyway?": a virtuous consideration of enhancement.." Christian bioethics, vol. 5, no. 2, 1999, pp. 104-20.
PMID 11658188

Abstract

Discussions of genetic enhancements often imply deep suspicions about human desires to manipulate or enhance the course of our future. These unspoken assumptions about the arrogance of the quest for perfection are at odds with the normally hopeful resonancy we find in contemporary theology. The author argues that these fears, suspicions and accusations are misplaced. The problem lies not with the question of whether we should pursue perfection, but rather what perfection we are pursuing. The author argues that perfection, properly understood, has an enormously positive function in the Roman Catholic tradition. The author examines three sources: the Scriptures, the scholastic tradition, and ascetical theology. He examines contemporary criticisms of perfectionism and suggests that an adequate virtue theory keeps us from engaging perfectionism as such. The author then shows how a positive, responsible view of perfection is an asset to our discussion on enhancement technology.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
기타 human scispacy 1
기타 Roman scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Anthropology; Catholicism; Ethical Theory; Ethics; Eugenics; Genetic Engineering; Genetic Enhancement; Genetic Therapy; Germ Cells; Goals; Health; History; Humans; Intelligence; Philosophy; Reference Standards; Religion; Self Care; Social Desirability; Social Justice; Social Values; Surgery, Plastic; Theology; Virtues; Wedge Argument