본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Adherence to Multidisciplinary Tumor Board (MTB) Recommendations in Patients With Breast Cancer: The Results From Two Cancer Centers in Germany.

1/5 보강
Clinical breast cancer 2026 Vol.26(1) p. 13-21
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
1563 patients with breast cancer were included in the study.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
In the multivariate analysis, adherence was a significant predictor of DFS but not OS. This suggests further research is needed to determine the factors underlying behind the survival time of patients with breast cancer.

Kandemir EA, Adam R, Roeper J, Ansmann L, Hülper P, Malik E, Köhne CH, Griesinger F

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] Multidisciplinary care is essential for the management of breast cancer.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value P < .05

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Kandemir EA, Adam R, et al. (2026). Adherence to Multidisciplinary Tumor Board (MTB) Recommendations in Patients With Breast Cancer: The Results From Two Cancer Centers in Germany.. Clinical breast cancer, 26(1), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2025.10.010
MLA Kandemir EA, et al.. "Adherence to Multidisciplinary Tumor Board (MTB) Recommendations in Patients With Breast Cancer: The Results From Two Cancer Centers in Germany.." Clinical breast cancer, vol. 26, no. 1, 2026, pp. 13-21.
PMID 41265066

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Multidisciplinary care is essential for the management of breast cancer. Multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs) can improve the health outcomes in breast cancer; however, the association of adherence to MTB recommendations with survival time has not been studied.

[METHODS] This is a retrospective observational study of patients with breast cancer diagnosed between 2014 and 2018 and discussed in the MTB meetings at 2 breast cancer centers certified by the German Cancer Society. Primary endpoints were adherence rate to MTB recommendations and disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard modelling were used. Ethics approval was obtained from the Ethical Commission of Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg (2018-100).

[RESULTS] In total, 1563 patients with breast cancer were included in the study. The adherence rate to MTB recommendations was 89.6%. The most common reason for nonadherence was patient preference (122 out of 162 nonadherent patients, 75.3%). There was a statistically significant difference in DFS and OS between adherent and nonadherent patients (log-rank test, P < .05). In the multivariate analysis, adherence was a significant predictor of DFS but not OS.

[CONCLUSION] Adherence to MTB recommendations demonstrated an improved DFS and OS in patients with breast cancer in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, adherence was a significant predictor of DFS but not OS. This suggests further research is needed to determine the factors underlying behind the survival time of patients with breast cancer.

MeSH Terms

Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Breast Neoplasms; Cancer Care Facilities; Disease-Free Survival; Germany; Patient Care Team; Retrospective Studies; Patient Compliance

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)