Adherence to Multidisciplinary Tumor Board (MTB) Recommendations in Patients With Breast Cancer: The Results From Two Cancer Centers in Germany.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
1563 patients with breast cancer were included in the study.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
In the multivariate analysis, adherence was a significant predictor of DFS but not OS. This suggests further research is needed to determine the factors underlying behind the survival time of patients with breast cancer.
[BACKGROUND] Multidisciplinary care is essential for the management of breast cancer.
- p-value P < .05
APA
Kandemir EA, Adam R, et al. (2026). Adherence to Multidisciplinary Tumor Board (MTB) Recommendations in Patients With Breast Cancer: The Results From Two Cancer Centers in Germany.. Clinical breast cancer, 26(1), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2025.10.010
MLA
Kandemir EA, et al.. "Adherence to Multidisciplinary Tumor Board (MTB) Recommendations in Patients With Breast Cancer: The Results From Two Cancer Centers in Germany.." Clinical breast cancer, vol. 26, no. 1, 2026, pp. 13-21.
PMID
41265066
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Multidisciplinary care is essential for the management of breast cancer. Multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs) can improve the health outcomes in breast cancer; however, the association of adherence to MTB recommendations with survival time has not been studied.
[METHODS] This is a retrospective observational study of patients with breast cancer diagnosed between 2014 and 2018 and discussed in the MTB meetings at 2 breast cancer centers certified by the German Cancer Society. Primary endpoints were adherence rate to MTB recommendations and disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard modelling were used. Ethics approval was obtained from the Ethical Commission of Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg (2018-100).
[RESULTS] In total, 1563 patients with breast cancer were included in the study. The adherence rate to MTB recommendations was 89.6%. The most common reason for nonadherence was patient preference (122 out of 162 nonadherent patients, 75.3%). There was a statistically significant difference in DFS and OS between adherent and nonadherent patients (log-rank test, P < .05). In the multivariate analysis, adherence was a significant predictor of DFS but not OS.
[CONCLUSION] Adherence to MTB recommendations demonstrated an improved DFS and OS in patients with breast cancer in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, adherence was a significant predictor of DFS but not OS. This suggests further research is needed to determine the factors underlying behind the survival time of patients with breast cancer.
[METHODS] This is a retrospective observational study of patients with breast cancer diagnosed between 2014 and 2018 and discussed in the MTB meetings at 2 breast cancer centers certified by the German Cancer Society. Primary endpoints were adherence rate to MTB recommendations and disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard modelling were used. Ethics approval was obtained from the Ethical Commission of Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg (2018-100).
[RESULTS] In total, 1563 patients with breast cancer were included in the study. The adherence rate to MTB recommendations was 89.6%. The most common reason for nonadherence was patient preference (122 out of 162 nonadherent patients, 75.3%). There was a statistically significant difference in DFS and OS between adherent and nonadherent patients (log-rank test, P < .05). In the multivariate analysis, adherence was a significant predictor of DFS but not OS.
[CONCLUSION] Adherence to MTB recommendations demonstrated an improved DFS and OS in patients with breast cancer in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, adherence was a significant predictor of DFS but not OS. This suggests further research is needed to determine the factors underlying behind the survival time of patients with breast cancer.
MeSH Terms
Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Breast Neoplasms; Cancer Care Facilities; Disease-Free Survival; Germany; Patient Care Team; Retrospective Studies; Patient Compliance