[Adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments of melanoma].
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
환자: advanced disease
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Therapeutic strategies, which are becoming increasingly personalised, are evolving very rapidly, with a trend towards de-escalation. We still lack robust biomarkers for patient selection.
The management of melanoma has evolved significantly over the past decade with the advent of immunotherapies and BRAF/MEK inhibitors, which have changed the prognosis for patients with advanced diseas
APA
Cazals de Fabel J, Gaudy-Marqueste C (2026). [Adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments of melanoma].. Bulletin du cancer, 113(1), 67-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulcan.2024.11.014
MLA
Cazals de Fabel J, et al.. "[Adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments of melanoma].." Bulletin du cancer, vol. 113, no. 1, 2026, pp. 67-76.
PMID
40023681 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
The management of melanoma has evolved significantly over the past decade with the advent of immunotherapies and BRAF/MEK inhibitors, which have changed the prognosis for patients with advanced disease. Having demonstrated their efficacy in advanced disease, these treatments have been evaluated and shown to be effective in adjuvant treatment at earlier stages, first in stage III and then in stage IIB-IIC. Alongside the development of these adjuvant treatments, which have become the standard of care, new therapeutic strategies have emerged. Neoadjuvant treatments have been shown to be superior to adjuvant treatments in phase II and III trials. These neoadjuvant strategies will undoubtedly become the new standard for patients with macroscopic lymph node disease. However, there are still many unanswered questions regarding the optimal treatment regimen. Should mono- or bi-immunotherapy be used? Can surgery be de-escalated? Is additional adjuvant treatment essential or can it be withheld in the event of a major pathological response? Should patients with BRAFV600 mutations switch to targeted therapies in the event of pathological non-response? Should we switch to targeted therapies in the event of pathological non-response in BRAFV600 mutant patients? Therapeutic strategies, which are becoming increasingly personalised, are evolving very rapidly, with a trend towards de-escalation. We still lack robust biomarkers for patient selection.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- Therapy-induced androgen receptor signaling as a candidate upstream driver of B7-H3-linked immune exclusion in melanoma: mechanisms and translational opportunities.
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Comprehensive analysis of androgen receptor splice variant target gene expression in prostate cancer.