Participation and Yield of Gastric Cancer Screening Programs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

[BACKGROUND & AIMS] Hundreds of gastric cancer (GC) screening programs have been launched worldwide over the past 3 decades. However, no comprehensive study evaluating the outcomes of these programs has been conducted.

[METHODS] This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the temporal and geographical patterns of three key indicators in GC screening programs: endoscopic uptake rate (EUR), GC detection rate (GCDR), and early GC detection rate (EGCDR). The search was conducted until September 20, 2023. Pooled random-effect estimates of the indicators were computed, with further subgroup analysis stratified by study period, country, screening setting, local GC age-standardized incidence, and pre-screening modality.

[RESULTS] A total of 67 studies were included in the analysis. Of these, 42 reported an EUR of 46% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41%-52%), 47 reported a GCDR of 0.76% (95% CI, 0.55%-0.96%), and 27 reported an EGCDR of 59% (95% CI, 49%-70%). Developed countries demonstrated notably superior performance in EUR (51% vs 37%; P = .009) and EGCDR (78% vs 44%; P < .001) compared with developing countries. A gradual increase in the EUR was found, rising from 46% pre-2010 to 48% post-2010 (P = .739). In contrast, both GCDR and EGCDR exhibited a slight decline, with GCDR decreasing from 0.78% pre-2010 to 0.75% post-2010 (P = .905), and EGCDR from 65% pre-2010 to 56% post-2010 (P = .404). Multivariate meta-regression analysis revealed that a higher local GC incidence and studies conducted in Japan were independently associated with higher values of both EUR (P = .010 and P = .027, respectively) and EGCDR (P = .008 and P = .002).

[CONCLUSIONS] The participation and yield of GC screening programs were comprehensively assessed using 3 indicators proposed in this study.