본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Jejunal and colonic reconstruction after esophagectomy in difficult gastric conduit: a multicenter study and meta-analysis.

메타분석 1/5 보강
Surgery today 📖 저널 OA 11.9% 2021: 0/1 OA 2022: 0/3 OA 2023: 0/2 OA 2024: 2/6 OA 2025: 2/45 OA 2026: 12/68 OA 2021~2026 2026 Vol.56(1) p. 74-83
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
추출되지 않음
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
jejunal or colonic reconstruction across four centers between January 2011 and March 2023
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[TRIAL REGISTRATION] no. M-2023-102.

Yasuda T, Matsuda A, Hagiwara N, Mishima K, Matsutani T, Nomura S

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[PURPOSE] When using the stomach for esophageal reconstruction is not viable, the jejunum or colon is used, but the optimal choice of organ remains unclear.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 16
  • p-value p = 0.001
  • p-value p = 0.029
  • OR 0.42
  • 연구 설계 cohort study

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Yasuda T, Matsuda A, et al. (2026). Jejunal and colonic reconstruction after esophagectomy in difficult gastric conduit: a multicenter study and meta-analysis.. Surgery today, 56(1), 74-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-025-03105-y
MLA Yasuda T, et al.. "Jejunal and colonic reconstruction after esophagectomy in difficult gastric conduit: a multicenter study and meta-analysis.." Surgery today, vol. 56, no. 1, 2026, pp. 74-83.
PMID 40707688 ↗

Abstract

[PURPOSE] When using the stomach for esophageal reconstruction is not viable, the jejunum or colon is used, but the optimal choice of organ remains unclear.

[METHODS] We conducted this multicenter retrospective cohort study to compare the short-term outcomes of patients who underwent jejunal or colonic reconstruction across four centers between January 2011 and March 2023. We also conducted a meta-analysis of studies published before November 2024 using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model to compare cervical anastomosis outcomes between jejunal and colonic reconstruction after esophageal cancer surgery.

[RESULTS] Vascular anastomosis was more frequent in the jejunal group (n = 16; p = 0.001), whereas simultaneous gastrectomy was more common in the colonic group (n = 13; p = 0.029). No significant differences were observed in anastomotic leakage (31.3 vs. 46.2%, p = 0.466), graft necrosis (6.3 vs. 0.0%, p = 1), or hospital mortality (6.3 vs. 7.7%, p = 1) between the groups. The meta-analysis showed a trend toward reduced leakage for jejunal reconstruction with vascular anastomosis (OR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.16-1.01, p = 0.05). Other outcomes were similar.

[CONCLUSIONS] The short-term outcomes of jejunal and colonic reconstructions were comparable. Jejunal reconstruction with vascular anastomosis may reduce leakage, but its prognostic benefits remain unclear.

[TRIAL REGISTRATION] no. M-2023-102.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반