본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Circulating tumor DNA methylation in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

메타분석 1/5 보강
Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry 📖 저널 OA 0% 2023: 0/1 OA 2024: 0/1 OA 2025: 0/11 OA 2026: 0/106 OA 2023~2026 2026 Vol.578() p. 120543
Retraction 확인
출처

Pan Z, Li G, Wu H, Pan F

ℹ️ 이 논문은 무료 전문이 아직 없습니다. 코퍼스 전체의 43.9%는 무료 가능 (통계 →) · 🏥 기관 EZproxy로 시도

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[OBJECTIVES] To synthetically evaluate the diagnostic performance of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) methylation for colorectal cancer (CRC).

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 연구 설계 meta-analysis

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Pan Z, Li G, et al. (2026). Circulating tumor DNA methylation in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.. Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry, 578, 120543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2025.120543
MLA Pan Z, et al.. "Circulating tumor DNA methylation in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.." Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry, vol. 578, 2026, pp. 120543.
PMID 40784630 ↗

Abstract

[OBJECTIVES] To synthetically evaluate the diagnostic performance of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) methylation for colorectal cancer (CRC).

[METHODS] Relevant articles published before March 4, 2025 were searched. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the areas under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were used to evaluate potential sources of heterogeneity.

[RESULTS] Totally, 147 articles containing 15,133 CRC patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and DOR of ctDNA methylation were 0.655, 0.902 and 20.662, respectively, yielding an AUC of 0.8851. Meanwhile, the combination of ctDNA methylation and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) achieved an AUC of 0.9269, with a sensitivity of 0.804, with a specificity of 0.904. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses indicated that the diagnostic value of multiple genes (AUC = 0.9059) and digital PCR assay (AUC = 0.8907) was higher than that of single gene and other assays. Gene dosage and detection method might be the sources of heterogeneity. There was no publication bias among these articles.

[CONCLUSION] The overall performance of ctDNA methylation had great diagnostic accuracy for the early screening and diagnosis of CRC, especially after combining with CEA, but many open questions remain before clinical application.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반