본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

A Novel Approach of Intraneural Facilitation Versus Standard Physical Therapy for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

무작위 임상시험 1/5 보강
Integrative cancer therapies 2026 Vol.25() p. 15347354251413222
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 4/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
38 patients, 12 (32%) experienced CIPN, with mean pain scores remaining mild (≤3) and no pharmacotherapy required until week 6.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
A Novel Approach of Intraneural Facilitation
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
Standard Physical Therapy for the Prevention of Chemotherapy
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
- The study was pre-registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03272919). August 8, 2017.

Hankins J, Bussell M, Gharibvand L, Jeon WJ, Castillo DR, D'Errico E, Nagaraj G

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

This study compared Intraneural Facilitation (INF) therapy and standard physical therapy (PT) in preventing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) in women with newly diagnosed breast and g

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 20

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Hankins J, Bussell M, et al. (2026). A Novel Approach of Intraneural Facilitation Versus Standard Physical Therapy for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.. Integrative cancer therapies, 25, 15347354251413222. https://doi.org/10.1177/15347354251413222
MLA Hankins J, et al.. "A Novel Approach of Intraneural Facilitation Versus Standard Physical Therapy for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.." Integrative cancer therapies, vol. 25, 2026, pp. 15347354251413222.
PMID 41840756

Abstract

This study compared Intraneural Facilitation (INF) therapy and standard physical therapy (PT) in preventing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) in women with newly diagnosed breast and gynecologic cancer. Thirty-eight women undergoing platinum and/or taxane-based chemotherapy, without prior peripheral neuropathy, were randomized into INF therapy (n = 20) and PT (n = 18). Treatments lasted 45 minutes, twice weekly, for 6 weeks. Neuropathy severity was evaluated using the Pain Quality Assessment Scale. Assessments were at baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months post-intervention. Acceptability, burden, and satisfaction were evaluated after 6 weeks. Among 38 patients, 12 (32%) experienced CIPN, with mean pain scores remaining mild (≤3) and no pharmacotherapy required until week 6. No adverse events were reported from the interventions. The INF therapy arm showed significant changes in numbness ( = 6.030,  = .001, partial η = 0.262) after week 6, while the PT arm showed significant changes in numbness ( = -2.39,  = .017), tingling ( = -2.84,  = .004), cramping ( = -2.120,  = .034), surface pain ( = -2.75,  = .006), and deep pain ( = -1.99,  = .046) between weeks 3 and 6. Nearly 80% of patients completed chemotherapy cycles with an average relative dose intensity of 90.4% (INF therapy: 87.73% vs PT: 73.44%). Ninety-four percent of patients were satisfied with their care, accepted the treatments, and perceived them as a low burden. The results demonstrated that INF therapy and PT are feasible options for CIPN, improving treatment adherence, outcomes, and quality of life for women with newly diagnosed breast and gynecological cancers. - The study was pre-registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03272919). August 8, 2017.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Female; Middle Aged; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Breast Neoplasms; Physical Therapy Modalities; Antineoplastic Agents; Adult; Aged; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Pain Measurement; Quality of Life; Patient Satisfaction; Taxoids