본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Non-Invasive Breast Cancer Receptor Typing from Mammograms Using Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

메타분석 1/5 보강
Journal of imaging informatics in medicine 📖 저널 OA 40.6% 2024: 3/3 OA 2025: 9/27 OA 2026: 16/39 OA 2024~2026 2026
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
We conducted a thorough search in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore up to May 2025.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Risk of bias was assessed with the PROBAST tool, and quality assessment was done using transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD).

Hosseinzadeh N, Behrouzieh S, Sharifi R, Sedighi N

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Artificial intelligence (AI) applied to screening mammography may non-invasively predict breast cancer molecular subtype and receptor status.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 연구 설계 systematic review

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Hosseinzadeh N, Behrouzieh S, et al. (2026). Non-Invasive Breast Cancer Receptor Typing from Mammograms Using Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.. Journal of imaging informatics in medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-025-01775-1
MLA Hosseinzadeh N, et al.. "Non-Invasive Breast Cancer Receptor Typing from Mammograms Using Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.." Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026.
PMID 41491736 ↗

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) applied to screening mammography may non-invasively predict breast cancer molecular subtype and receptor status. We conducted a PRISMA-DTA systematic review and bivariate random-effects meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD420251032810) on this subject. Methods: We conducted a thorough search in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore up to May 2025. Eligible studies compared mammogram AI predictions with histopathologic findings. Risk of bias was assessed with the PROBAST tool, and quality assessment was done using transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD). Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. On internal test sets, pooled AUC/sensitivity/specificity were 0.86/84%/80% for luminal subtype, 0.80/70%/78% for HER2-enriched tumors, and 0.76/75%/83% for triple-negative breast cancer. Multi-class receptor-status tasks yielded AUCs: estrogen receptor 0.71, progesterone receptor 0.59, HER2 0.64, and Ki-67 0.60. Binary receptor-status tasks provided AUCs: HER2 0.80 and hormone receptor positive 0.71. Heterogeneity was substantial (I often > 75%). AI from mammograms shows moderate-to-high discrimination, strongest for luminal and triple-negative disease, but evidence is insufficient for clinical deployment. Priorities include larger multicenter cohorts, standardized pipelines, preregistered external validation, uncertainty quantification, and multimodal fusion.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반