Tranexamic acid to prevent bleeding in patients with hematologic malignancies and hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis.
[BACKGROUND] Tranexamic acid (TXA) is commonly used off-label as an adjunct to prophylactic platelet transfusion to prevent bleeding in patients with hematological malignancies undergoing intensive ch
- 95% CI 0.77-1.07
- 연구 설계 meta-analysis
APA
Alsuliman T, Chalayer E, et al. (2026). Tranexamic acid to prevent bleeding in patients with hematologic malignancies and hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis.. Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH, 24(1), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtha.2025.09.009
MLA
Alsuliman T, et al.. "Tranexamic acid to prevent bleeding in patients with hematologic malignancies and hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis.." Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH, vol. 24, no. 1, 2026, pp. 99-107.
PMID
41067389
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Tranexamic acid (TXA) is commonly used off-label as an adjunct to prophylactic platelet transfusion to prevent bleeding in patients with hematological malignancies undergoing intensive chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
[OBJECTIVES] We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the efficacy and safety of TXA vs placebo for the primary prevention of bleeding in patients with hematological malignancies experiencing hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia.
[METHODS] Embase, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL were searched from inception until June 30, 2025. The primary efficacy outcome was the incidence of World Health Organization grade of ≥2 bleeding. The secondary efficacy outcome was the mean number of platelet transfusions per participant in each group. Safety outcomes included the incidence of thrombotic events, veno-occlusive disease, and all-cause mortality. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed for the outcomes of interest.
[RESULTS] Two RCTs enrolling 946 patients were included. Compared with placebo, TXA did not reduce the risk of World Health Organization grade of ≥2 bleeding (relative risk [RR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.77-1.07) or the mean number of platelet transfusions per participant (standardized mean difference, 0.00; 95% CI, -0.12 to 0.13). The risk of thrombotic events (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.43-2.32), veno-occlusive disease (RR, 1.49; 95% CI, 0.42-5.25), and all-cause mortality (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.78-2.02) was similar in the 2 groups. Trial sequential analysis for the primary outcome indicated that the current evidence is conclusive, suggesting the futility of additional RCTs.
[CONCLUSIONS] TXA did not provide sufficient benefits to justify its routine use for preventing bleeding in this patient population.
[OBJECTIVES] We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the efficacy and safety of TXA vs placebo for the primary prevention of bleeding in patients with hematological malignancies experiencing hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia.
[METHODS] Embase, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL were searched from inception until June 30, 2025. The primary efficacy outcome was the incidence of World Health Organization grade of ≥2 bleeding. The secondary efficacy outcome was the mean number of platelet transfusions per participant in each group. Safety outcomes included the incidence of thrombotic events, veno-occlusive disease, and all-cause mortality. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed for the outcomes of interest.
[RESULTS] Two RCTs enrolling 946 patients were included. Compared with placebo, TXA did not reduce the risk of World Health Organization grade of ≥2 bleeding (relative risk [RR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.77-1.07) or the mean number of platelet transfusions per participant (standardized mean difference, 0.00; 95% CI, -0.12 to 0.13). The risk of thrombotic events (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.43-2.32), veno-occlusive disease (RR, 1.49; 95% CI, 0.42-5.25), and all-cause mortality (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.78-2.02) was similar in the 2 groups. Trial sequential analysis for the primary outcome indicated that the current evidence is conclusive, suggesting the futility of additional RCTs.
[CONCLUSIONS] TXA did not provide sufficient benefits to justify its routine use for preventing bleeding in this patient population.
MeSH Terms
Humans; Tranexamic Acid; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thrombocytopenia; Hemorrhage; Hematologic Neoplasms; Antifibrinolytic Agents; Treatment Outcome; Platelet Transfusion; Risk Factors; Female; Male; Middle Aged