Endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection: choosing the right tool to a polyp-free colon.
1/5 보강
[PURPOSE OF REVIEW] Endoscopic resection is now the standard of care for the management of colorectal polyps.
APA
Wahba GM, Nehme F, Ge PS (2026). Endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection: choosing the right tool to a polyp-free colon.. Current opinion in gastroenterology, 42(1), 43-51. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOG.0000000000001140
MLA
Wahba GM, et al.. "Endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection: choosing the right tool to a polyp-free colon.." Current opinion in gastroenterology, vol. 42, no. 1, 2026, pp. 43-51.
PMID
41086286 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[PURPOSE OF REVIEW] Endoscopic resection is now the standard of care for the management of colorectal polyps. With increased training and expertise in endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), it is important to recognize their complementary roles, as well as their individual strengths and limitations.
[RECENT FINDINGS] Here, we draw upon the experience of a real patient scenario to provide a case-based review on EMR and ESD. We will review evidence-based technical refinements to EMR which have improved procedural safety and decreased recurrence rates, as well as how expanded access to ESD and enhanced training has resulted in improvements in outcomes and adverse events. Finally, we will discuss how lesion, patient, and endoscopist factors influence the overall endoscopic resection strategy.
[SUMMARY] EMR and ESD are complementary tools in the modern endoscopic resection toolkit, and the correct resection strategy draws upon a deep understanding of the tools available and is individualized based upon patient, endoscopist, and lesion characteristics.
[RECENT FINDINGS] Here, we draw upon the experience of a real patient scenario to provide a case-based review on EMR and ESD. We will review evidence-based technical refinements to EMR which have improved procedural safety and decreased recurrence rates, as well as how expanded access to ESD and enhanced training has resulted in improvements in outcomes and adverse events. Finally, we will discuss how lesion, patient, and endoscopist factors influence the overall endoscopic resection strategy.
[SUMMARY] EMR and ESD are complementary tools in the modern endoscopic resection toolkit, and the correct resection strategy draws upon a deep understanding of the tools available and is individualized based upon patient, endoscopist, and lesion characteristics.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Surgery for Thyroid Cancer.
- Association of patient health education with the postoperative health related quality of life in low- intermediate recurrence risk differentiated thyroid cancer patients.