Radiomics-Based Prediction of Lymphedema after Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer: Integrating Clinical and Dosimetric Features.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
532 patients (399 training and 133 testing) who underwent breast cancer surgery followed by PORT.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
breast cancer surgery followed by PORT
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSION] Integrating radiomic features with clinical and dosimetric factors showed potential to enhance lymphedema prediction in patients with breast cancer receiving PORT. This model can potentially guide personalized treatment strategies and improve patient outcomes.
[PURPOSE] Arm lymphedema is a common, debilitating complication in patients with breast cancer undergoing postoperative radiotherapy (PORT).
- p-value p=0.036
- p-value p=0.010
- Sensitivity 74.6%
- Specificity 79.7%
APA
Kim JS, Jeon SH, et al. (2026). Radiomics-Based Prediction of Lymphedema after Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer: Integrating Clinical and Dosimetric Features.. Cancer research and treatment. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2025.985
MLA
Kim JS, et al.. "Radiomics-Based Prediction of Lymphedema after Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer: Integrating Clinical and Dosimetric Features.." Cancer research and treatment, 2026.
PMID
41531151
Abstract
[PURPOSE] Arm lymphedema is a common, debilitating complication in patients with breast cancer undergoing postoperative radiotherapy (PORT). Although clinical and dosimetric factors have been used for risk prediction, radiomics offers a novel approach for improving the predictive accuracy.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] We designed a predictive model for lymphedema using clinical, dosimetric, and radiomic features. We included 532 patients (399 training and 133 testing) who underwent breast cancer surgery followed by PORT. Radiomic features were extracted from axillary levels I, II, III, and supraclavicular regions, which were automatically contoured on PORT-planning computed tomography scans. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was used for feature selection. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.
[RESULTS] The Combined model integrating clinical, dosimetric, and radiomic features showed higher predictive performance (AUC: training 0.783, test 0.767, total 0.779) than the Clinical/Dosimetric (AUC: training 0.730, test 0.671, total 0.717) and Radiomics-only (AUC: training 0.721, test 0.668, total 0.708) models. The Combined model also achieved a higher accuracy (training 78.9%, test 78.2%, total 78.8%), sensitivity (training 74.6%, test 62.5%, total 72.0%), and specificity (training 79.7%, test 80.3%, total 79.9%) than the other models. DeLong's test confirmed that the Combined model significantly outperformed the Clinical/Dosimetric model (p=0.036 in training and p=0.010 in all datasets).
[CONCLUSION] Integrating radiomic features with clinical and dosimetric factors showed potential to enhance lymphedema prediction in patients with breast cancer receiving PORT. This model can potentially guide personalized treatment strategies and improve patient outcomes.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] We designed a predictive model for lymphedema using clinical, dosimetric, and radiomic features. We included 532 patients (399 training and 133 testing) who underwent breast cancer surgery followed by PORT. Radiomic features were extracted from axillary levels I, II, III, and supraclavicular regions, which were automatically contoured on PORT-planning computed tomography scans. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was used for feature selection. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.
[RESULTS] The Combined model integrating clinical, dosimetric, and radiomic features showed higher predictive performance (AUC: training 0.783, test 0.767, total 0.779) than the Clinical/Dosimetric (AUC: training 0.730, test 0.671, total 0.717) and Radiomics-only (AUC: training 0.721, test 0.668, total 0.708) models. The Combined model also achieved a higher accuracy (training 78.9%, test 78.2%, total 78.8%), sensitivity (training 74.6%, test 62.5%, total 72.0%), and specificity (training 79.7%, test 80.3%, total 79.9%) than the other models. DeLong's test confirmed that the Combined model significantly outperformed the Clinical/Dosimetric model (p=0.036 in training and p=0.010 in all datasets).
[CONCLUSION] Integrating radiomic features with clinical and dosimetric factors showed potential to enhance lymphedema prediction in patients with breast cancer receiving PORT. This model can potentially guide personalized treatment strategies and improve patient outcomes.
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)
- Outcomes of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab After Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab in Advanced HCC: An International Multicentre Study.
- Response: Reassessing the Use of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab After Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab in Advanced HCC.
- Ultrasound-Based Classification of Infraorbital Fat and Groove Patterns: Clinical Implications for Safer Filler Injection.
- Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in pediatric cancer survivors: risk and medication use in a nationwide population-based study.
- Biodegradability and Efficacy of Porous Polycaprolactone Microsphere Dermal Filler for Fine Lines.